RFC3981 IRIS: The Internet Registry Information Service (IRIS) CoreProtocol
3981 IRIS: The Internet Registry Information Service (IRIS) CoreProtocol. A. Newton, M. Sanz. January 2005. (Format: TXT=101359 bytes) (Updated by RFC4992) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD)
日本語訳
RFC一覧
参照
Network Working Group A. Newton Request for Comments: 3981 VeriSign, Inc. Category: Standards Track M. Sanz DENIC eG January 2005 IRIS: The Internet Registry Information Service (IRIS) Core Protocol Status of This Memo This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005). Abstract This document describes an application layer client-server protocol for a framework to represent the query and result operations of the information services of Internet registries. Specified in the Extensible Markup Language (XML), the protocol defines generic query and result operations and a mechanism for extending these operations for specific registry service needs. Table of Contents 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.1. Use of XML . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.2. General Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.3. Framework Layers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.4. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.5. Further Reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2. Document Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3. Protocol Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 4. Exchange Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.1. Request Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.2. Response Format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4.3. Extension Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.3.1. Derived Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.3.2. Registry Type Identifier Requirements . . . . . 10 4.3.3. Entity Classes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.3.4. Names of Entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 3981 IRIS-Core January 2005 4.3.5. References to Entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 4.3.6. Temporary Entities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 4.3.7.Derived Elements . . . . . . . . . . . 13 4.3.8. and Elements . . . . . . . 16 4.4. Relay Bags . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 5. Database Serialization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 6. Formal XML Syntax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 7. The IRIS URI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 7.1. URI Definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 7.2. Transport Specific Schemes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 7.3. URI Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 7.3.1. Registry Dependent Resolution . . . . . . . . . 38 7.3.2. Direct Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 7.3.3. Transport and Service Location . . . . . . . . . 39 7.4. IRIS URI Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 8. Checklists . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 8.1. Registry Definition Checklist . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 8.2. Transport Mapping Checklist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 9. Internationalization Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 10. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 11. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 12. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 12.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 12.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 A. S-NAPTR and IRIS Uses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 A.1. Examples of S-NAPTR with IRIS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 A.2. Using S-NAPTR for Cohabitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 B. IRIS Design Philosophy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 B.1. The Basic Premise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 B.2. The Lure of a Universal Client . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 B.3. Server Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 B.4. Lookups, Searches, and Entity Classes . . . . . . . . . 50 B.5. Entities References, Search Continuations, and Scope . . 50 C. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 1. Introduction The specification outlined in this document is based on the functional requirements described in CRISP [17]. 1.1. Use of XML This document describes the specification for the Internet Registry Information Service (IRIS), an XML text protocol intended to describe the query types and result types of various registry information services. IRIS is specified by using the Extensible Markup Language Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 3981 IRIS-Core January 2005 (XML) 1.0 as described in [2], XML Schema notation as described in [4] and [5], and XML Namespaces as described in [3]. 1.2. General Concepts Each kind of Internet registry is identified by a registry type. The identifier for a registry type is a Uniform Resource Name (URN) used within the XML instances to identify the XML schema that formally describes the set of queries, results, and entity classes allowed within that type of registry. The structure of these URNs makes no assumptions or restrictions on the types of registries they identify. Therefore, IRIS may support multiple registry types of a disparate or similar nature; it is only a matter of definition. For instance, a single registry type may be defined for domain name registries, and multiple registry types for the various IP address registries. A registry information server may handle queries and serve results for multiple registry types. Each registry type that a particular registry operator serves is a registry service instance. IRIS and the XML schema formally describing IRIS do not specify any registry, registry identifier, or knowledge of a particular service instance or set of instances. IRIS is a specification for a framework with which these registries can be defined, used and, in some cases, interoperate. The framework merely specifies the elements for registry identification and the elements that must be used to derive queries and results. This framework allows a registry type to define its own structure for naming, entities, queries, etc., through the use of XML namespaces and XML schemas (hence, a registry type MUST be identified by the same URI that identifies its XML namespace). To be compliant, a registry type's specification must extend from this framework. The framework defines certain structures that can be common to all registry types, such as references to entities, search continuations, and entity classes. A registry type may declare its own definitions for all of these, or it may mix its derived definitions with the base definitions. IRIS defines two types of referrals: an entity reference and a search continuation. An entity reference indicates specific knowledge about an individual entity, and a search continuation allows distributed searches. Both referrals may span differing registry types and instances. No assumptions or specifications are made about the roots, bases, or meshes of entities. Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 3] RFC 3981 IRIS-Core January 2005 1.3. Framework Layers The IRIS framework can be thought of as having three layers. ----------------------------- Registry-Specific |domain | address | etc... | ----------------------------- Common-Registry | IRIS | ----------------------------- Application-Transport | beep | iris-lwz | etc... | ----------------------------- In this figure, "beep" refers to the Blocks Extensible Exchange Protocol (BEEP) (see [20]), and "iris-lwz" refers to a theoretical UDP binding that uses compression. The differing layers have the following responsibilities: Registry-Specific :: defines queries, results, and entity classes of a specific type of registry. Each specific type of registry is identified by a URN. Common-Registry :: defines base operations and semantics common to all registry types such as search sets, result sets, and referrals. It also defines the syntaxes for talking about specific registry types. Application-Transport :: defines the mechanisms for authentication, message passing, connection and session management, etc. It also defines the URI syntax specific to the application-transport mechanism. 1.4. Definitions For clarity, the following definitions are supplied: o registry type -- A registry serving a specific function, such as a domain registry or an address registry. Each type of registry is assigned a URN. o registry schema -- The definition for a registry type specifying the queries, results, and entity classes. o authority -- A reference to the server or set of servers containing information. o resolution method -- The technique used to locate an authority. o entity class -- A group of entities with a common type or common set of characteristics. Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 4] RFC 3981 IRIS-Core January 2005 o entity name -- The identifier used to refer to a single entity within an entity class. o entity reference -- A pointer to an entity composed of an authority, an optional resolution method, a registry type, an entity class, and an entity name. One type of entity reference is the IRIS URI (defined in Section 7). The terms "derivative", "derive", and "derivation" are used with the same meaning for deriving one type of element from another as specified in XML_SS [5]. 1.5. Further Reading Appendix B contains text answering the question, "Why IRIS?". This document describes the structure at the core of IRIS. The following documents describe the other aspects of IRIS relevant to CRISP [17]: iris-beep [1] and iris-dreg [18]. 2. Document Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, RFC 2119 [8]. 3. Protocol Identification The root element of all request XML instances MUST be . The root element of all response XML instances MUST be . These elements identify the start of the IRIS elements, the XML namespace used as the identifier for IRIS, and, optionally, the location of the schema. These elements and the associated closing tag MUST be applied to all requests and responses sent by both clients and servers. The use of the schema location attribute 'xsi:schemaLocation' is OPTIONAL with respect to this specification, and IRIS implementations MAY resolve it to retrieve the schema or MAY use a locally cached version of the schema. Versioning of the IRIS protocol is the responsibility of the application-transport layer but MUST be associated with the XML namespace [3] URI representing IRIS. A change in this URI indicates a change of the underlying schema and, therefore, a new version of the protocol (and vice versa). Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 5] RFC 3981 IRIS-Core January 2005 4. Exchange Description This section describes the request and response exchanges of the protocol. The descriptions contained within this section refer to XML elements and attributes and their relation to the exchange of data within the protocol. These descriptions also contain specifications outside the scope of the formal XML syntax. Therefore, this section will use terms defined by RFC 2119 [8] to describe the specification outside the scope of the formal XML syntax. While reading this section, please reference Section 6 for details on the formal XML syntax. 4.1. Request Format A element contains an optional element and a set of elements. The elements enable a client to query a particular registry type by using the URN identifying the registry type. This can be found in one of its two children: and . The element describes the lookup of an entity in a specific registry. This element has three attributes: 'registryType', 'entityClass', and 'entityName'. The 'registryType' attribute contains the registry identifier for the registry type in which the lookup operation will take place. The 'entityClass' attribute contains the token identifying the index for which the lookup operation will take place, and the 'entityName' attribute contains the name of the entity to look up. The element is abstract and may not legally appear in an XML instance. It provides the base type that registry schemas will use to define derived query types. This derivation mechanism is described in Section 4.3. Each may also contain a element. When this element appears as a child of , it MUST NOT contain the 'id' attribute. For a description of the element, see Section 4.4. The element may contain one child element of any XML namespace. This child element allows a client to signal a server for special states or processing. An example of one such child element may be found in Section 4.3.8. 4.2. Response Format The element contains an optional element, a set of elements, and an optional element. Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 6] RFC 3981 IRIS-Core January 2005 The elements are responses to a request. The contents of this element contain an element, an optional element, and error elements, if applicable. The children of the element are of the following types: o is an abstract element and may not be legally placed in an XML instance. It provides the base type to be used by registry schemas to define derived result types. This derivation mechanism is described in Section 4.3. o is an element specifying an entity reference. See Section 4.3.5. o The element specifies a query referral. Its one child is any element derived from (see Section 4.3.1). To direct the query to a referent server, has a mandatory 'authority' attribute and an optional 'resolution' attribute. The element may also contain a 'bagRef' attribute. For a description of the 'bagRef' attribute, see Section 4.4. When following entity references and search continuations, clients SHOULD only follow an or response once. Failure to do so may result in the client process getting stuck in a never-ending query loop, commonly known as a referral loop. The element only contains elements, as described above. This element allows a server to indicate to a client results that were not specifically queried but that are related to the queried results, thus enabling the client to display this distinction to a user properly. The element use is optional. The following elements, which represent error conditions, may be returned: o -- The corresponding query requires resources unobtainable by the server. o -- A name given in a query is not syntactically correct. o -- Parameters of the corresponding query are not semantically meaningful. o -- The corresponding query is not supported by this server. Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 7] RFC 3981 IRIS-Core January 2005 o -- The corresponding query requires more resources than allowed. o -- The name given in a query does not match a known entity. o -- The authentication given does not allow access to a specific result entry. o -- The contents of a bag were unrecognized. See Section 4.4. o -- The contents of a bag were not and never will be acceptable. See Section 4.4. o -- The contents of a bag were not acceptable at this time. See Section 4.4. o A derivative of , as described in Section 4.3. The section is divided into the and sections to allow easier processing and navigation of the results by a client. Servers MUST return the direct answers to queries in the element and MAY return results in the element for which a reference has been made in the element. Results in the element MUST have been referenced in the , either as direct children of the element or as deeper descendants of the element. This serves two purposes. First, it may eliminate a requery by the client for references contained in the element. Second, it distinguishes between results that are a direct result of a query and those that would have been returned had the client followed the appropriate referrals, thus hinting how clients could process or display the returned results. For instance, clients constructing complex displays with tree navigation widgets will know that results in the element should all be directly beneath the root node of the tree, while results in the element are leaf nodes of those produced from the element. A element (child of ) is a response to a element, and provides a means for a server to advise a client of the effect of a element. The element (child of ) is optional. It contains elements, and the contents of each element constitute one element in any XML namespace. Each element has an 'id' attribute, which is referenced by the 'bagRef' attribute of entity Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 8] RFC 3981 IRIS-Core January 2005 references ( ) and search continuations ( ). See Section 4.4. 4.3. Extension Framework Because the IRIS schema defines only one query type, and two stand- alone result types, and does not define a registry structure, it is of limited use by itself. Extension of IRIS is accomplished through the use of a base IRIS schema, as defined in XML_SD [4] and XML_SS [5], and through extension of it by schemas constructed on top of IRIS. 4.3.1. Derived Elements The XML Schema definition of IRIS requires schemas of registry types to derive element types from base types in the IRIS definition. The registry schemas MUST derive elements to define typed queries and results. While the IRIS schema definition does not prohibit the derivation of any elements, registry schemas SHOULD restrict the derivations to the following types: o -- As defined, this element contains no content and has no valid attributes. It is abstract and therefore only its derivatives appear in XML instances. Registry schemas derive from this element to define the queries allowed. o -- As defined, this element contains no content and has five valid attributes: 'authority', 'resolution' (optional), 'registryType', 'entityClass', 'entityName', and 'temporaryReference' (optional, see Section 4.3.6). It is abstract and therefore only its derivatives appear in XML instances. Registry schemas derive from this element to define results that may be returned from a query. o -- As defined, this element is an instance of . It contains the optional elements and , which further describe the nature of the error. o -- Identifies a reference to an entity. Registry schemas SHOULD use elements derived from but MAY use directly. The advantage of deriving from vs. direct use is the chance to define the name of the element and to use that name descriptively -- for instance, as the role the entity plays with respect to another entity. See Section 4.3.5. Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 9] RFC 3981 IRIS-Core January 2005 o -- Indicates a reference to an entity that has indirect association with a parent element representing an entity. This element is derived from the element (Section 4.3.5). Registry schemas MAY derive from this element or MAY use it directly. 4.3.2. Registry Type Identifier Requirements The identifier for a registry type and the XML namespace identifier used by the XML Schema describing the registry MUST be the same. These identifiers MUST be restricted to a URN [7] registered in the 'ns' class of the IANA registry governed by XML_URN [9]. These identifiers are case insensitive. This is a restriction on XML_NS [3], which specifies that an XML namespace identifier is any valid URI [6]. These identifiers MAY be abbreviated to the part following the class component and its separator of the URN. For example, the full URN "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:dreg1" may be abbreviated to "dreg1". In use with IRIS, this abbreviation MUST NOT be used inside of XML instances in which the XML Schema [4] specifies the use of a URI for schema identification or where XML_NS [3] specifies the use of a URI for XML namespace identification. 4.3.3. Entity Classes IRIS provides entity classes to help avoid collisions with entity names within any given registry type. Their specification in queries also allows server implementations to narrow search or lookup scopes quickly to a single index. For instance, the entity name "192.0.2.0" might refer to separate entities in the "name-server" and "network" classes. The entity "192.0.2.0" in the "name-server" class may refer to the name server host that is also multi-homed by address 192.0.2.255 and known in DNS as "ns.example.com", whereas the entity "192.0.2.0" in the "network" class may refer to the network 192.0.2/30. IRIS defines two default entity classes of "local" and "iris", which MUST NOT be redefined. These entity classes MUST be valid in all registry types. The "local" class is reserved for entities defined locally by a server operator and does not denote any particular type of entity. A lookup in this entity class MAY result in an entity reference or search continuation. For example, "iris:dreg1//example.com/local/ Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 10] RFC 3981 IRIS-Core January 2005 myhosts" may result in a search continuation yielding the nameservers for example.com. The "iris" class is reserved for entities specific to a particular service instance. It MUST contain the following entity names (see Section 4.3.4): o "id", which yields a result of (see Section 4.3.7.1). o "limits", which yields a result of (see Section 4.3.7.2). This entity class MAY contain other locally defined entities as well. The names of entity classes in a registry schema are of type token, as defined by XML_SD [4]. Their case sensitivity MUST be defined by the definition of the registry type. In general, they SHOULD be case insensitive. 4.3.4. Names of Entities The names of entities in a registry schema are of type token, as defined by XML_SD [4]. Names of entities SHOULD be unique within an instance of any particular entity class within a registry. Two entities SHOULD NOT have the same name, but a single entity MAY be known by multiple names. In situations where a single name may result in two entities, the registry schema SHOULD make allowances by defining result types that contain entity references to both entities (e.g., "example.com" can refer to both the domain example.com and the host example.com). However, this type of conflict SHOULD generally be avoided by the proper use of entity classes. The case sensitivity of entity names is dependent on the entity class in which they reside. The definition of a registry type MUST specify the case sensitivity for entity names. A registry type MAY define the entity names of differing entity classes as having different case sensitivity. 4.3.5. References to Entities The element allows references to entities in result sets, either as a direct child of or within a more complex structure deriving from . The element is defined by 'entityType'. Registry schemas SHOULD define elements derived from when referencing entities but may use the element directly. Deriving a new element allows a registry schema to use the Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 11] RFC 3981 IRIS-Core January 2005 name of the new element to signify the relationship the referenced entity has with the referrer. A derivative of MUST NOT be used as a substitute when the element is declared (such as in the section of the ). The element (and elements of type 'entityType') can have child elements of with an optional 'language' attribute. These are provided so that servers may provide clients with a more human-friendly description of the entity reference. This is often useful to users navigating referral structures. The element (and its derivations) have the following attributes: o 'authority', 'resolution' (optional), 'registryType', 'entityClass', and 'entityName' -- These attributes specify where the entity may be found. o 'temporaryReference' -- This attribute is optional. See Section 4.3.6. o 'referentType' -- This attribute contains the expected type of the entity being referenced and may contain the word "ANY" or a qualified XML name. Unlike the other attributes of , this attribute is qualified and declared in the IRIS XML namespace. Therefore it will also be qualified with the prefix associated with the IRIS XML namespace (e.g., 'iris:referentType'). This allows clients to recognize entity references using an element derived from . o 'bagRef' -- This attribute is optional. If present, it must contain an XML identifier to a element in the section of the result set. For a description of the 'bagRef' attribute, see Section 4.4. 4.3.6. Temporary Entities Instances may exist in which an entity reference needs to be temporary. For example, a particular type of result may only have one unique key. If that key contains semantic meaning that may not be exposed to all users, a synthetic key will have to be substituted. Furthermore, there may be times when data in the data store is not normalized in the same manner as that expressed by the registry schema. In the registry schema, objects of type A may reference objects of type B. But in the data store, objects of type A may contain objects of type B. Again, a synthetic key will have to be temporarily produced. Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 12] RFC 3981 IRIS-Core January 2005 To support such use cases, results and entity references can be declared temporary by using the 'temporaryReference' attribute. This attribute is of type boolean [4] and has a default value of "false". It is optional for derivatives and elements of type 'entityType'. When this attribute is used, the entity reference data (e.g., 'entityClass', 'entityName') is only valid within the response in which it appears and may not be consistent with subsequent responses. A server MUST include the referent of any temporary entity reference in the section of the same 4.3.7. Derived Elements The base IRIS framework contains three elements directly derived from the element for use by any registry type. 4.3.7.1. An example of a result: The example.com example.net example.org Internet Assigned Numbers Authority iana@iana.org element is provided to allow IRIS clients to reference IRIS service instances. It contains the following elements: o -- This element contains one or more elements. Each element contains a URI authority component for which the server has results. Although a server MAY only return a partial list of its authority areas, depending on operator policy, it MUST return the authority for which the client has requested. Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 13] RFC 3981 IRIS-Core January 2005 o -- This element contains the name of the operator of the server. o -- These optional elements contain email addresses of the operator of the service instance. o -- These optional elements contain phone numbers of the operator of the service instance. o -- See Section 4.3.1 for its definition. 4.3.7.2. An example of a result: The 2 15 25 200 2 15 element provides a mechanism allowing a server to inform a client of the limits it may encounter from overuse of the service. The contents describe the service limitations to a client at the current level of access. The contents of this element are as follows: o -- This element describes the total number of queries that the server will accept. The children of this element indicate this number per unit of time. The children are , , , and . Each child MUST only appear once as a child of , but more than one child MAY be present. For example, a server could indicate that it will accept 15 queries a minute but only 60 queries a day. Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 14] RFC 3981 IRIS-Core January 2005 o -- This element describes the total number of results that the server will send to a client. The children of this element indicate this number per unit of time in the same manner as . o -- This element describes the total number of sessions that the server will accept from a client. The children of this element indicate this number per unit of time in the same manner as . The definition of a session is defined the by application transport layer. o -- This element describes other restrictions that may only be expressible outside of the structured syntax of the other child elements of . This element may have optional child elements, each with a mandatory 'language' attribute. o -- These elements are provided to reference other entities, such as a (Section 4.3.7.3) describing a published policy. See (Section 4.3.1). All of these child elements are optional, and a server may express that it has no limits by using a element with no content (e.g., ). 4.3.7.3. An example of a result: The Example.com is reserved according to RFC 2606. element is provided so that service operators may make simple additions to other entities without deriving entirely new registry types. Its definition allows service operators to reference it from other entities (using, for instance, a element). The is meant to represent name and value pairs of strings, allowing each pair to be associated with a specific language qualifier and an optional URI pointing to more information. Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 15] RFC 3981 IRIS-Core January 2005 Clients may easily display such information in a two-column table. Applications using binary data or richer data structures are out of scope for this element. When such usage scenarios arise, a client will likely need specific knowledge to handle such data, thus calling the need for a new registry type into question. 4.3.8. and Elements The (Section 4.1) and (Section 4.2) elements allow the client to request from the server special states for the processing of queries. The intent of these elements is to allow extensibility so that some jurisdictions may adopt policies for query processing without requiring re-versioning of IRIS or any registry type. This document defines one control, , and its requisite reaction, , for compliance with CRISP [17]. When a client sends an control, it is only asking the server to check to see whether adequate permissions are available to execute the queries in the associated request. A server MUST respond to this control with a element. The element provides a server with a standard means to respond to controls (it may be used by other controls, but this is left to their definition). It contains four children: o -- the processing or state needed by the control has been accepted. o -- the processing or state needed by the control has been denied (a transient failure). o -- the processing or state needed by the control cannot be activated (a permanent failure). o -- the control is not recognized (a permanent failure). If is rejected, then the server MUST return all appropriate result sets (i.e., for every search set in the request), but all result sets MUST be empty of results and MUST contain no errors (a reaction is not part of a result set and is therefore not a result set error). This control applies to all search sets or none of them; therefore a server MUST issue a rejection if cannot be accepted for all search sets in a request. Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 16] RFC 3981 IRIS-Core January 2005 An example of an IRIS XML exchange using these elements follows: C: C: C: C: S: S:C: C: C:C: C: C: C: C:C: C: S: S: Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 17] RFC 3981 IRIS-Core January 2005 4.4. Relay Bags IRIS employs bags to allow a server to relay information to a referent server via the client. These bags are generated by the queried server, passed to the client as opaque data, and then passed to the referent server for processing. The contents of the bags are not defined by IRIS, and the client MUST NOT make any assumptions about the contents of a bag when relaying it from one server to another. When a server returns a result set to a client, theS: S: S:S: S:S: S: S: S:S: S: S:S: S: S:S: It is illegal to use information from this service S: for the purposes of sending unsolicited bulk email. S: S:element may contain a child element. This child element contains one or more elements. Each of these MUST contain an 'id' attribute containing the XML data type ID. Entity references and search continuations that have to specify a bag to be used when they are followed MUST have a 'bagRef' attribute containing the XML data type IDREF. See Section 4.2. This allows the response to specify a bag only once but allows each entity reference or search continuation (in all result sets) to have a distinct bag, as needed. When following an entity reference or search continuation that specifies the use of a bag, the client MUST include the referenced bag in the search set as a child of the element. See Section 4.1. See Section 4.2 for the list of errors a server may return to a client when a bag is received. A server MUST NOT ignore a bag when it is received. In case a bag cannot be recognized or accepted, one of the errors from Section 4.2 MUST be returned. An example of an IRIS XML exchange using these elements follows: C: C: C: C: S: S:C: C: C: C:C: C: C:C: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX C: C:Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 18] RFC 3981 IRIS-Core January 2005 C: C: S: S: 5. Database Serialization This section describes a method for serializing IRIS registry entities. The descriptions contained within this section refer to XML elements and attributes and their relation to this serialization process. These descriptions also contain specifications outside the scope of the formal XML syntax. This section will use terms defined by RFC 2119 [8] to describe these. While reading this section, please reference Section 6 for needed details on the formal XML syntax. Newton & Sanz Standards Track [Page 19] RFC 3981 IRIS-Core January 2005 A database of IRIS entities can be serialized to file storage with XML [2] by using the IRIS definedS: S: S:S: S: S:S: S: S:S: Acceptable Usage Policy S: S:S: S: S:S: S: S:S: AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAABIwAAAIEA0ddD+W3Agl0Lel98G1r77fZ S: S:element. This element contains element derivatives and elements. Derivatives of the element are entities. Servers loading these entities MUST place the entity in the entity classes specified by the elements 'registryType', 'entityClass', and 'entityName' attributes and in any entity classes the entities may apply according to explicitly defined children of that element. For instance, if a registry type has two entity classes "foo" and "bar" and a derivative has the attributes entityClass="foo" and entityName="one" and a child element two , the server is to enter that entity into the entity class "foo" as the name "one" and into the entity class "bar" as the name "two". Servers loading entities as serialized derivatives of theelement MAY translate the authority attribute. Servers will likely have to do this if the authority for the entity has changed. elements allow the serialization of explicit entity references and search continuations. This element has a child
一覧
スポンサーリンク