RFC1800 日本語訳
1800 Internet Official Protocol Standards. J. Postel, Ed.. July 1995. (Format: TXT=83649 bytes) (Obsoletes RFC1780) (Obsoleted by RFC1880) (Status: HISTORIC)
プログラムでの自動翻訳です。
RFC一覧
英語原文
Network Working Group Internet Architecture Board Request for Comments: 1800 J. Postel, Editor Obsoletes: RFCs 1780, 1720, 1610, 1600, July 1995 1540, 1500, 1410, 1360, 1280, 1250, 1200, 1140, 1130, 1100, 1083 STD: 1 Category: Standards Track
コメントを求めるワーキンググループインターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会の要求をネットワークでつないでください: 1800 J.ポステル、エディタは以下を時代遅れにします。 RFCs1780、1720、1610、1600、1995 1540、1500、1410、1360、1280、1250、1200、1140、1130、1100、1083年7月のSTD: 1つのカテゴリ: 標準化過程
INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
インターネット公式プロトコル標準
Status of this Memo
このMemoの状態
This memo describes the state of standardization of protocols used in the Internet as determined by the Internet Architecture Board (IAB). This memo is an Internet Standard. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
このメモはインターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会(IAB)によって決定されるようにインターネットで使用されるプロトコルの標準化の状態について説明します。 このメモはインターネットStandardです。 このメモの分配は無制限です。
Table of Contents
目次
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1. The Standardization Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2. The Request for Comments Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 3. Other Reference Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.1. Assigned Numbers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.2. Gateway Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.3. Host Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.4. The MIL-STD Documents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 4. Explanation of Terms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4.1. Definitions of Protocol State (Maturity Level) . . . . . . 9 4.1.1. Standard Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.1.2. Draft Standard Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.1.3. Proposed Standard Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.1.4. Experimental Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.1.5. Informational Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.1.6. Historic Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.2. Definitions of Protocol Status (Requirement Level) . . . 10 4.2.1. Required Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.2.2. Recommended Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.2.3. Elective Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.2.4. Limited Use Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.2.5. Not Recommended Protocol . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5. The Standards Track . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 5.1. The RFC Processing Decision Table . . . . . . . . . . . 11 5.2. The Standards Track Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 6. The Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 6.1. Recent Changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
序論. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1。 標準化過程. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 2。 コメントを求める要求は.5 3を記録します。 他の参照は.63.1を記録します。 規定番号. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.2。 ゲートウェイ要件. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.3。 要件. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 3.4を接待してください。 軍規格は.6 4を記録します。 用語. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 4.1に関する説明。 プロトコルの定義は(成熟レベル). . . . . . 9 4.1.1を述べます。 標準プロトコル. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.1.2。 標準プロトコル. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.1.3を作成してください。 提案された標準プロトコル. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.1.4。 実験プロトコル. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.1.5。 情報のプロトコル. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.1.6。 歴史的なプロトコル. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.2。 プロトコル状態(要件レベル).104.2.1の定義。 必要なプロトコル. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.2.2。 お勧めのプロトコル. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.2.3。 選挙のプロトコル. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.2.4。 株式会社使用プロトコル. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 4.2.5。 お勧めのプロトコル. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 5でない。 規格は.115.1を追跡します。 RFC処理決定表. . . . . . . . . . . 11 5.2。 規格はダイヤグラム. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 6を追跡します。 プロトコル. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 6.1。 最近の変化. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
Internet Architecture Board [Page 1] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会[1ページ]RFC1800インターネット規格1995年7月
6.1.1. New RFCs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 6.1.2. Other Changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 6.2. Standard Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 6.3. Network-Specific Standard Protocols . . . . . . . . . . 20 6.4. Draft Standard Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 6.5. Proposed Standard Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 6.6. Telnet Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 6.7. Experimental Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 6.8. Informational Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 6.9. Historic Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 6.10 Obsolete Protocols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 7. Contacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 7.1. IAB, IETF, and IRTF Contacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 7.1.1. Internet Architecture Board (IAB) Contact . . . . . . 32 7.1.2. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Contact . . . . 32 7.1.3. Internet Research Task Force (IRTF) Contact . . . . . 33 7.2. Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Contact . . . 34 7.3. Request for Comments Editor Contact . . . . . . . . . . 35 7.4. Network Information Center Contact . . . . . . . . . . . 35 7.5. Sources for Requests for Comments . . . . . . . . . . . 36 8. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 9. Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
6.1.1. 新しいRFCs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 6.1.2。 他の変化. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 6.2。 標準プロトコル. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 6.3。 ネットワーク特有の標準プロトコル. . . . . . . . . . 20 6.4。 標準プロトコル. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 6.5を作成してください。 提案された標準プロトコル. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 6.6。 telnetオプション. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 6.7。 実験プロトコル. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 6.8。 情報のプロトコル. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 6.9。 歴史的なプロトコル. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 6.10はプロトコル. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 7を時代遅れにします。 接触. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 7.1。 IAB、IETF、およびIRTF接触. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 7.1.1。 インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会(IAB)の接触. . . . . . 32 7.1.2。 インターネット・エンジニアリング・タスク・フォース(IETF)の接触. . . . 32 7.1.3。 インターネット研究課題力の(IRTF)は.337.2に連絡します。 インターネットは数の権威(IANA)に接触. . . 34 7.3を割り当てました。 コメントには、エディタ接触. . . . . . . . . . 35 7.4を要求してください。 インフォメーション・センターの接触. . . . . . . . . . . 35 7.5をネットワークでつないでください。 コメント. . . . . . . . . . . 36 8を求める要求のためのソース。 セキュリティ問題. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 9。 作者のアドレス. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Introduction
序論
A discussion of the standardization process and the RFC document series is presented first, followed by an explanation of the terms. Sections 6.2 - 6.10 contain the lists of protocols in each stage of standardization. Finally are pointers to references and contacts for further information.
標準化過程とRFCドキュメントシリーズの議論は最初に提示されます、用語に関する説明があとに続いていて。セクションは6.2、6.10にそれぞれのステージの標準化におけるプロトコルのリストを含みます。 最終的に、詳細に関する参照と接触へのポインタがあります。
This memo is intended to be issued approximately quarterly; please be sure the copy you are reading is current. Current copies may be obtained from the Network Information Center (INTERNIC) or from the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) (see the contact information at the end of this memo). Do not use this edition after 31-Oct-95.
ほとんど年4回でこのメモが発行されることを意図します。 あなたが読んでいるコピーがよく見られるのを確認してください。 Networkインフォメーション・センター(INTERNIC)かインターネットAssigned民数記Authority(IANA)から現在のコピーを入手するかもしれません(このメモの端で問い合わせ先を見てください)。 1995年10月31日以降、この版を使用しないでください。
See Section 6.1 for a description of recent changes. In the official lists in sections 6.2 - 6.10, an asterisk (*) next to a protocol denotes that it is new to this document or has been moved from one protocol level to another, or differs from the previous edition of this document.
最近の変化の記述に関してセクション6.1を見てください。 職員では、6.2--6.10がセクションで記載していて、プロトコルの横のアスタリスク(*)は、それがこのドキュメントに新しかったか、または1つのプロトコルレベルから別のものに移されたのを指示するか、またはこのドキュメントの前の版と異なっています。
Internet Architecture Board [Page 2] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会[2ページ]RFC1800インターネット規格1995年7月
1. The Standardization Process
1. 標準化過程
The Internet Architecture Board maintains this list of documents that define standards for the Internet protocol suite. See RFC-1601 for the charter of the IAB and RFC-1160 for an explanation of the role and organization of the IAB and its subsidiary groups, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) and the Internet Research Task Force (IRTF). Each of these groups has a steering group called the IESG and IRSG, respectively. The IETF develops these standards with the goal of co-ordinating the evolution of the Internet protocols; this co-ordination has become quite important as the Internet protocols are increasingly in general commercial use. The definitive description of the Internet standards process is found in RFC-1602.
インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会はインターネット・プロトコル群の規格を定義するドキュメントのこのリストを維持します。 IABとRFC-1160の特許に関して役割に関する説明と、IABの組織とその補助のグループ、インターネット・エンジニアリング・タスク・フォース(IETF)、およびインターネットResearch Task Force(IRTF)にRFC-1601を見てください。 それぞれのこれらのグループには、それぞれIESGとIRSGと呼ばれる運営グループがあります。 IETFはインターネットプロトコルの発展を調整するという目標のためにこれらの規格を開発します。 ますます一般に、インターネットプロトコルがなったようにこのコーディネーションはかなり重要になりました。商業用途。 インターネット標準化過程の決定的な記述はRFC-1602で見つけられます。
The majority of Internet protocol development and standardization activity takes place in the working groups of the IETF.
インターネットプロトコル開発と標準化活動の大部分がIETFのワーキンググループで行われます。
Protocols which are to become standards in the Internet go through a series of states or maturity levels (proposed standard, draft standard, and standard) involving increasing amounts of scrutiny and testing. When a protocol completes this process it is assigned a STD number (see RFC-1311). At each step, the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG) of the IETF must make a recommendation for advancement of the protocol.
インターネットで規格になることになっているプロトコルは、増加する量の精査とテストにかかわりながら、一連の州か成熟レベル(提案された標準、草稿規格、および規格)に直面しています。 プロトコルがこの過程を完了すると、STD番号はそれに割り当てられます(RFC-1311を見てください)。 各ステップでは、IETFのインターネットEngineering Steering Group(IESG)はプロトコルの振興のために勧告しなければなりません。
To allow time for the Internet community to consider and react to standardization proposals, a minimum delay of 6 months before a proposed standard can be advanced to a draft standard and 4 months before a draft standard can be promoted to standard.
インターネットコミュニティが標準化提案に考えて、反応する時間を許容するために、草稿規格と草稿規格の4カ月前に提案された標準に達することができる何カ月も前に6の最小の遅れを規格に促進できます。
It is general practice that no proposed standard can be promoted to draft standard without at least two independent implementations (and the recommendation of the IESG). Promotion from draft standard to standard generally requires operational experience and demonstrated interoperability of two or more implementations (and the recommendation of the IESG).
少なくとも2つの独立している実現(そして、IESGの推薦)なしで規格を作成するために提案された標準を全く促進できないのは、一般診療です。 一般に、草稿規格から規格への販売促進は2つ以上の実現(そして、IESGの推薦)の運用経験と示された相互運用性を必要とします。
In cases where there is uncertainty as to the proper decision concerning a protocol a special review committee may be appointed consisting of experts from the IETF, IRTF and the IAB with the purpose of recommending an explicit action.
適切な決定に関してプロトコルに関して不確実性がある場合では、特別な再調査委員会は明白な動作を推薦する目的でIETFからの専門家から成る、IRTF、およびIABに任命されるかもしれません。
Advancement of a protocol to proposed standard is an important step since it marks a protocol as a candidate for eventual standardization (it puts the protocol "on the standards track"). Advancement to draft standard is a major step which warns the community that, unless major objections are raised or flaws are discovered, the protocol is likely to be advanced to standard in six months.
最後の標準化の候補としてプロトコルをマークするので(それは「標準化過程」にプロトコルを置きます)、提案された標準へのプロトコルの振興は重要なステップです。 規格を作成する前進は主要な反論が高くしているか、または欠点が発見されない場合プロトコルが6カ月後に規格に進められそうであると共同体に警告する主要なステップです。
Internet Architecture Board [Page 3] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会[3ページ]RFC1800インターネット規格1995年7月
Some protocols have been superseded by better ones or are otherwise unused. Such protocols are still documented in this memorandum with the designation "historic".
いくつかのプロトコルが、より良いものによって取って代わられたか、またはそうでなければ、未使用です。 名称が「歴史的に」そのようなプロトコルはまだこのメモに記録されています。
Because it is useful to document the results of early protocol research and development work, some of the RFCs document protocols which are still in an experimental condition. The protocols are designated "experimental" in this memorandum. They appear in this report as a convenience to the community and not as evidence of their standardization.
早めのプロトコル研究開発仕事の結果を記録するのが役に立つので、いくつかのRFCsがまだ実験状態であるプロトコルを記録します。 プロトコルはこのメモで「実験的に」指定されます。 彼らは便利としてこのレポートで彼らの標準化に関する証拠ではなく、共同体に見えます。
Other protocols, such as those developed by other standards organizations, or by particular vendors, may be of interest or may be recommended for use in the Internet. The specifications of such protocols may be published as RFCs for the convenience of the Internet community. These protocols are labeled "informational" in this memorandum.
それらなどの他のプロトコルは、他の規格組織、または特定の業者によって開発されるか、興味があるかもしれないか、またはインターネットでの使用のために推薦されるかもしれません。 そのようなプロトコルの仕様はインターネットコミュニティの都合のためにRFCsとして発表されるかもしれません。 これらのプロトコルはこのメモで「情報である」とラベルされます。
In addition to the working groups of the IETF, protocol development and experimentation may take place as a result of the work of the research groups of the Internet Research Task Force, or the work of other individuals interested in Internet protocol development. The the documentation of such experimental work in the RFC series is encouraged, but none of this work is considered to be on the track for standardization until the IESG has made a recommendation to advance the protocol to the proposed standard state.
IETFのワーキンググループに加えて、プロトコル開発と実験はインターネットResearch Task Forceの研究グループの仕事、またはインターネットプロトコル開発に興味を持っている他の個人の仕事の結果、行われるかもしれません。 RFCシリーズにおけるそのような実験研究のドキュメンテーションは奨励されますが、標準化のための道の上にIESGが提案された標準状態にプロトコルを唱えるという推薦状をするまでこの仕事のどれかがあると考えられません。
A few protocols have achieved widespread implementation without the approval of the IESG. For example, some vendor protocols have become very important to the Internet community even though they have not been recommended by the IESG. However, the IAB strongly recommends that the standards process be used in the evolution of the protocol suite to maximize interoperability (and to prevent incompatible protocol requirements from arising). The use of the terms "standard", "draft standard", and "proposed standard" are reserved in any RFC or other publication of Internet protocols to only those protocols which the IESG has approved.
いくつかのプロトコルがIESGの承認なしで広範囲の実現を実現しました。 例えば、それらはIESGによって推薦されていませんが、いくつかの業者プロトコルがインターネットコミュニティに非常に重要になりました。 しかしながら、IABは、標準化過程が相互運用性を最大にすること(両立しないプロトコル要件が起こるのを防ぐために)にプロトコル群の発展に使用されることを強く勧めます。 「規格」という用語、「草稿規格」、および「提案された標準」の使用はIESGが承認したそれらのプロトコルだけへのインターネットプロトコルのどんなRFCでも予約されるか他の公表です。
In addition to a state (like "Proposed Standard"), a protocol is also
assigned a status, or requirement level, in this document. The
possible requirement levels ("Required", "Recommended", "Elective",
"Limited Use", and "Not Recommended") are defined in Section 4.2.
When a protocol is on the standards track, that is in the proposed
standard, draft standard, or standard state (see Section 5), the
status shown in Section 6 is the current status.
また、状態(「提案された標準」のような)に加えて、状態、または要件レベルがプロトコルに割り当てられます、本書では。 可能な要件レベル(「必要で」、「お勧め」の、そして、「選挙」の、そして、「株式会社使用」の、そして、「お勧めでない」)はセクション4.2で定義されます。 標準化過程の上にプロトコルがあるとき、それは提案された標準、草稿規格、または標準の状態にあって(セクション5を見てください)、セクション6に示された状態は現在の状態です。
Few protocols are required to be implemented in all systems; this is because there is such a variety of possible systems, for example,
わずかなプロトコルしかすべてのシステムで実行されるのに必要ではありません。 これは例えば、そのようなさまざまな可能なシステムがあるからです
Internet Architecture Board [Page 4] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会[4ページ]RFC1800インターネット規格1995年7月
gateways, routers, terminal servers, workstations, and multi-user hosts. The requirement level shown in this document is only a one word label, which may not be sufficient to characterize the implementation requirements for a protocol in all situations. For some protocols, this document contains an additional status paragraph (an applicability statement). In addition, more detailed status information may be contained in separate requirements documents (see Section 3).
ゲートウェイ、ルータ、端末のサーバ、ワークステーション、およびマルチユーザホスト。 本書では示された要件レベルは1個の単語ラベルにすぎません。(そのラベルはすべての状況におけるプロトコルのための実現要件を特徴付けることができないかもしれません)。 いくつかのプロトコルのために、このドキュメントは追加状態パラグラフ(適用性証明)を含んでいます。 さらに、より詳細な状態情報は別々の要件ドキュメントに含まれるかもしれません(セクション3を見てください)。
2. The Request for Comments Documents
2. コメントドキュメントに関する要求
The documents called Request for Comments (or RFCs) are the working notes of the "Network Working Group", that is the Internet research and development community. A document in this series may be on essentially any topic related to computer communication, and may be anything from a meeting report to the specification of a standard.
Comments(または、RFCs)のためのRequestと呼ばれるドキュメントはすなわち、「ネットワークワーキンググループ」、インターネット研究開発共同体の働く注意です。 このシリーズにおけるドキュメントは、コンピュータコミュニケーションに関連する本質的にはどんな話題に関してもあるかもしれなくて、ミーティングレポートから規格の仕様まで何かであるかもしれません。
Notice:
通知:
All standards are published as RFCs, but not all RFCs specify
standards.
すべてのRFCsではなく、RFCsが規格を指定するとき、すべての規格が発行されます。
Anyone can submit a document for publication as an RFC. Submissions must be made via electronic mail to the RFC Editor (see the contact information at the end of this memo, and see RFC 1543).
だれでもRFCとして公表のためのドキュメントを提出できます。 RFC Editorへの電子メールを通して差出をしなければなりません(このメモの端で問い合わせ先を見てください、そして、RFC1543を見てください)。
While RFCs are not refereed publications, they do receive technical review from the task forces, individual technical experts, or the RFC Editor, as appropriate.
RFCsは仲裁された刊行物ではありませんが、彼らは特別委員会、個々の技術家、またはRFC Editorから技術審査を受け取ります、適宜。
The RFC series comprises a wide range of documents, ranging from informational documents of general interests to specifications of standard Internet protocols. In cases where submission is intended to document a proposed standard, draft standard, or standard protocol, the RFC Editor will publish the document only with the approval of the IESG. For documents describing experimental work, the RFC Editor will notify the IESG before publication, allowing for the possibility of review by the relevant IETF working group or IRTF research group and provide those comments to the author. See Section 5.1 for more detail.
RFCシリーズはさまざまなドキュメントを包括します、一般的興味の情報のドキュメントから標準のインターネットプロトコルの仕様まで及んで。 服従が提案された標準、草稿規格、または標準プロトコルを記録することを意図する場合では、RFC EditorはIESGの承認だけをもってドキュメントを発表するでしょう。 実験研究について説明するドキュメントに関しては、公表、関連IETFワーキンググループによるレビューの可能性を考慮するか、またはIRTF研究がそれらのコメントを作者に分類して、提供する前にRFC EditorはIESGに通知するでしょう。 その他の詳細に関してセクション5.1を見てください。
Once a document is assigned an RFC number and published, that RFC is never revised or re-issued with the same number. There is never a question of having the most recent version of a particular RFC. However, a protocol (such as File Transfer Protocol (FTP)) may be improved and re-documented many times in several different RFCs. It is important to verify that you have the most recent RFC on a particular protocol. This "Internet Official Protocol Standards"
ドキュメントがいったんRFC番号が割り当てられて、発表されると、そのRFCは同じ数で改訂されるか、または決して再発行されません。 特定のRFCの最新のバージョンを持つ問題が決してありません。 しかしながら、プロトコル(File Transferプロトコル(FTP)などの)は、何回も数個の異なったRFCsに改良されて、再記録されるかもしれません。 あなたが特定のプロトコルに最新のRFCを持っていることを確かめるのは重要です。 この「インターネット公式プロトコル標準」
Internet Architecture Board [Page 5] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会[5ページ]RFC1800インターネット規格1995年7月
memo is the reference for determining the correct RFC for the current specification of each protocol.
メモはそれぞれのプロトコルの現在の仕様のために正しいRFCを決定する参照です。
The RFCs are available from the INTERNIC, and a number of other sites. For more information about obtaining RFCs, see Sections 7.4 and 7.5.
RFCsはINTERNIC、および他の多くのサイトから利用可能です。 RFCsを入手することに関する詳しい情報に関しては、セクション7.4と7.5を見てください。
3. Other Reference Documents
3. 他の参考書類
There are three other reference documents of interest in checking the current status of protocol specifications and standardization. These are the Assigned Numbers, the Gateway Requirements, and the Host Requirements. Note that these documents are revised and updated at different times; in case of differences between these documents, the most recent must prevail.
プロトコル仕様と標準化の現在の状態をチェックするのにおいて興味深い他の3つの参考書類があります。 これらは、Assigned民数記と、ゲートウェイRequirementsと、Host Requirementsです。 いろいろな時間にこれらのドキュメントを改訂して、アップデートすることに注意してください。 間の違いの場合には、これらのドキュメント、最新の必須は行き渡っています。
Also, one should be aware of the MIL-STD publications on IP, TCP, Telnet, FTP, and SMTP. These are described in Section 3.4.
また、IP、TCP、Telnet、FTP、およびSMTPに関する軍規格刊行物を意識しているべきです。 これらはセクション3.4で説明されます。
3.1. Assigned Numbers
3.1. 規定番号
The "Assigned Numbers" document lists the assigned values of the parameters used in the various protocols. For example, IP protocol codes, TCP port numbers, Telnet Option Codes, ARP hardware types, and Terminal Type names. Assigned Numbers was most recently issued as RFC-1700.
「規定番号」というドキュメントは様々なプロトコルに使用されるパラメタの割り当てられた値を記載します。 例えば、IPプロトコルコードであり、TCPは数、Telnet Option Codes、ARPハードウェアタイプ、およびTerminal Type名を移植します。 民数記が割り当てられているのは、RFC-1700として発行されたごく最近でした。
3.2. Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers
3.2. IPバージョン4ルータのための要件
This document reviews the specifications that apply to gateways and supplies guidance and clarification for any ambiguities. Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers is RFC-1812.
このドキュメントは、ゲートウェイに適用される仕様を再検討して、どんなあいまいさのための指導と明確化も供給します。 IPバージョン4Routersのための要件はRFC-1812です。
3.3. Host Requirements
3.3. ホスト要件
This pair of documents reviews and updates the specifications that apply to hosts, and it supplies guidance and clarification for any ambiguities. Host Requirements was issued as RFC-1122 and RFC-1123.
ドキュメントのこの組は、ホストに適用される仕様を、見直して、アップデートします、そして、それはどんなあいまいさのための指導と明確化も供給します。 ホストRequirementsはRFC-1122とRFC-1123として発行されました。
3.4. The MIL-STD Documents
3.4. 軍規格ドキュメント
The Internet community specifications for IP (RFC-791) and TCP (RFC- 793) and the DoD MIL-STD specifications are intended to describe exactly the same protocols. Any difference in the protocols specified by these sets of documents should be reported to DISA and to the IESG. It is strongly advised that the two sets of documents be used together, along with RFC-1122 and RFC-1123.
IP(RFC-791)とTCP(RFC793)のためのインターネットコミュニティ仕様とDoD軍規格仕様がまさに同じプロトコルについて説明することを意図します。 これらのセットのドキュメントによって指定されたプロトコルのどんな違いもDISAと、そして、IESGに報告されるべきです。 2セットのドキュメントがRFC-1122とRFC-1123と共に一緒に使用されると強く忠告されます。
Internet Architecture Board [Page 6] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会[6ページ]RFC1800インターネット規格1995年7月
Note that these MIL-STD are now somewhat out of date. The Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers (RFC-1812) and Host Requirements (RFC-1122, RFC-1123) take precedence over both earlier RFCs and the MIL-STDs.
これらの軍規格が現在いくらか時代遅れであることに注意してください。 IPバージョン4Routers(RFC-1812)とHost Requirements(RFC-1122、RFC-1123)のためのRequirementsは以前のRFCsと軍規格の両方の上で優先します。
2045-13501 Internet Routing between Autonomous Systems
2045-13501 自律システムの間のインターネットルート設定
2045-14502-01 Internet Transport Profile for DoD
Communications, Part 1: Transport and Internet Services
2045-14502-01 DoDコミュニケーション、第1部のためのインターネット輸送プロフィール: 輸送とインターネットのサービス
2045-14502-04 Internet Transport Profile for DoD
Communications, Part 4: LAN Media-Independent Requirements
2045-14502-04 DoDコミュニケーション、パート4のためのインターネット輸送プロフィール: LANのメディアから独立している要件
2045-14503 Internet Transport Service Supporting OSI
Applications
2045-14503 OSIアプリケーションを支持するインターネット輸送サービス
2045-44500 Tactical Communications
2045-44500 戦術のコミュニケーション
2045-17503-01 Internet Message Transfer Profile for DoD
Communications Part 1: Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
2045-17503-01 DoDコミュニケーション第1部のためのインターネットメッセージ転送プロフィール: シンプルメールトランスファプロトコル
2045-17503-02 Internet Message Transfer Profile for DoD
Communications Part 2: Format of Text Messages
2045-17503-02 DoDコミュニケーション第2部のためのインターネットメッセージ転送プロフィール: テキスト・メッセージの形式
2045-17504 Internet File Transfer Profile for DoD
Communications
2045-17504 DoDコミュニケーションのためのインターネットファイル転送プロフィール
2045-17505 Internet Domain Name Service (DNS) Profile for DoD
Communications
2045-17505 インターネットドメイン名サービス(DNS)はDoDのためにコミュニケーションの輪郭を描きます。
2045-17506 Internet Remote Login (RLOGIN) Profile for DoD
Communications
2045-17506 (RLOGIN)がDoDコミュニケーションのために輪郭を描くインターネットリモート・ログイン
2045-17507 Internet Network Management Profile for DoD
Communications
2045-17507 DoDコミュニケーションのためのインターネットネットワークマネージメントプロフィール
2045-38000 DoD Network Management for DoD Communications
2045-38000 DoDコミュニケーションのためのDoDネットワークマネージメント
These documents are available from the Naval Publications and Forms Center. Requests can be initiated by telephone, telegraph, or mail; however, it is preferred that private industry use form DD1425, if possible.
これらのドキュメントはNaval PublicationsとFormsセンターから利用可能です。 電話、電報、またはメールは要求を開始できます。 しかしながら、できれば、民間産業使用がDD1425を形成するのが好ましいです。
Naval Publications and Forms Center, Code 3015
5801 Tabor Ave
Philadelphia, PA 19120
Phone: 1-215-697-3321 (order tape)
1-215-697-4834 (conversation)
海軍の刊行物とフォームセンター、Aveフィラデルフィア、PA 19120が電話をする3015 5801小太鼓をコード化してください: 1-215-697-3321(オーダーテープ) 1-215-697-4834(会話)
Internet Architecture Board [Page 7] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会[7ページ]RFC1800インターネット規格1995年7月
4. Explanation of Terms
4. 用語に関する説明
There are two independent categorization of protocols. The first is the "maturity level" or STATE of standardization, one of "standard", "draft standard", "proposed standard", "experimental", "informational" or "historic". The second is the "requirement level" or STATUS of this protocol, one of "required", "recommended", "elective", "limited use", or "not recommended".
プロトコルの2の独立している分類があります。 1番目は、標準化の「成熟レベル」か州です、1。「実験的である」か、「情報的」、または、「歴史的な」「標準」の、そして、「草稿標準」の「提案された標準」について。 2番目は、このプロトコルの「要件レベル」かSTATUSです、1。「お勧め」の、または、「選挙」の、または、「限られた使用」の、または、「お勧めでない」「必要」について。
The status or requirement level is difficult to portray in a one word label. These status labels should be considered only as an indication, and a further description, or applicability statement, should be consulted.
状態か要件レベルは1個の単語ラベルに描くのが難しいです。 これらの状態ラベルは指示だけと考えられるべきです、そして、さらなる記述、または適用性証明が参照されるべきです。
When a protocol is advanced to proposed standard or draft standard, it is labeled with a current status.
プロトコルが提案された標準か草稿規格に唱えられるとき、それは現在の状態でラベルされます。
At any given time a protocol occupies a cell of the following matrix. Protocols are likely to be in cells in about the following proportions (indicated by the relative number of Xs). A new protocol is most likely to start in the (proposed standard, elective) cell, or the (experimental, limited use) cell.
その時々で、プロトコルは以下のマトリクスのセルを占領します。 中にセルの中に以下の割合(Xsの相対数で、示される)に関してプロトコルがありそうです。 新しいプロトコルは(提案された標準、選択科目)セル、または(実験的で、限られた使用)セルの中で最も始まりそうです。
S T A T U S
Req Rec Ele Lim Not
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
Std | X | XXX | XXX | | |
S +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
Draft | X | X | XXX | | |
T +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
Prop | | X | XXX | | |
A +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
Info | | | | | |
T +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
Expr | | | | XXX | |
E +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
Hist | | | | | XXX |
+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
S Tは+ではなく、T U S Req Rec Eleリムです。-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ Std| X| XXX| XXX| | | S+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ 草稿| X| X| XXX| | | T+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ 支柱| | X| XXX| | | +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ インフォメーション| | | | | | T+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ Expr| | | | XXX| | E+-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+ Hist| | | | | XXX| +-----+-----+-----+-----+-----+
What is a "system"?
「システム」は何ですか?
Some protocols are particular to hosts and some to gateways; a few
protocols are used in both. The definitions of the terms below
will refer to a "system" which is either a host or a gateway (or
both). It should be clear from the context of the particular
protocol which types of systems are intended.
いくつかのプロトコルがゲートウェイへのホストといくつかに特定です。 いくつかのプロトコルが両方で使用されます。 以下での用語の定義はホストかゲートウェイのどちらかである「システム」(ともに)について言及するでしょう。 どのタイプのシステムが意図するかは、特定のプロトコルの文脈から明確であるはずです。
Internet Architecture Board [Page 8] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会[8ページ]RFC1800インターネット規格1995年7月
4.1. Definitions of Protocol State
4.1. プロトコル状態の定義
Every protocol listed in this document is assigned to a "maturity level" or STATE of standardization: "standard", "draft standard", "proposed standard", "experimental", or "historic".
本書では記載されたあらゆるプロトコルが標準化の「成熟レベル」か州に配属されます: 「実験的である」か、「歴史的な」「標準」の、そして、「草稿標準」の「提案された標準。」
4.1.1. Standard Protocol
4.1.1. 標準プロトコル
The IESG has established this as an official standard protocol for
the Internet. These protocols are assigned STD numbers (see RFC-
1311). These are separated into two groups: (1) IP protocol and
above, protocols that apply to the whole Internet; and (2)
network-specific protocols, generally specifications of how to do
IP on particular types of networks.
IESGは、インターネットへの公式の標準プロトコルとこれを書き立てました。 STD番号はこれらのプロトコルに割り当てられます(RFC1311を見てください)。 これらは2つのグループに切り離されます: (1) 全体のインターネットに適用されるIPプロトコルと上、プロトコル。 (2) ネットワーク特有のプロトコル、一般に特定のタイプのネットワークでどうIPをするかに関する仕様。
4.1.2. Draft Standard Protocol
4.1.2. 標準プロトコルを作成してください。
The IESG is actively considering this protocol as a possible
Standard Protocol. Substantial and widespread testing and comment
are desired. Comments and test results should be submitted to the
IESG. There is a possibility that changes will be made in a Draft
Standard Protocol before it becomes a Standard Protocol.
IESGは、このプロトコルが可能なStandardプロトコルであると活発にみなしています。 実質的で広範囲のテストとコメントは望まれています。 コメントと試験の成績をIESGに提出するべきです。 Standardプロトコルになる前に、変更がDraft Standardプロトコルで行われる可能性があります。
4.1.3. Proposed Standard Protocol
4.1.3. 提案された標準プロトコル
These are protocol proposals that may be considered by the IESG
for standardization in the future. Implementation and testing by
several groups is desirable. Revision of the protocol
specification is likely.
これらは将来標準化のためにIESGによって検討されるかもしれないプロトコル提案です。 実現といくつかのグループでテストするのは望ましいです。 プロトコル仕様の改正はありそうです。
4.1.4. Experimental Protocol
4.1.4. 実験プロトコル
A system should not implement an experimental protocol unless it
is participating in the experiment and has coordinated its use of
the protocol with the developer of the protocol.
システムは、実験に参加していない場合実験プロトコルを実行するべきでなくて、プロトコルの開発者とのプロトコルの使用を調整しました。
Typically, experimental protocols are those that are developed as
part of an ongoing research project not related to an operational
service offering. While they may be proposed as a service
protocol at a later stage, and thus become proposed standard,
draft standard, and then standard protocols, the designation of a
protocol as experimental may sometimes be meant to suggest that
the protocol, although perhaps mature, is not intended for
operational use.
実験プロトコルは通常、継続中の研究プロジェクトの一部が操作上のサービス提供に関連しないで開発されたものです。 後期段階にサービスプロトコルとして提案されて、その結果、提案された標準、草稿規格、および次に、標準プロトコルになっているかもしれない間、実験的であるとしてのプロトコルの名称は、時々恐らく熟しますが、プロトコルが操作上の使用のために意図しないのを示すことになっているかもしれません。
Internet Architecture Board [Page 9] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会[9ページ]RFC1800インターネット規格1995年7月
4.1.5. Informational Protocol
4.1.5. 情報のプロトコル
Protocols developed by other standard organizations, or vendors,
or that are for other reasons outside the purview of the IESG, may
be published as RFCs for the convenience of the Internet community
as informational protocols.
他の理由で、IESGの範囲の外でそれがいます、そして、プロトコルが他の標準の組織、または業者で展開したか、または情報のプロトコルとしてのインターネットコミュニティの都合のためにRFCsとして発表されるかもしれません。
4.1.6. Historic Protocol
4.1.6. 歴史的なプロトコル
These are protocols that are unlikely to ever become standards in
the Internet either because they have been superseded by later
developments or due to lack of interest.
これらは後の開発でそれらが取って代わられたためか無関心のためインターネットで規格になりそうにないプロトコルです。
4.2. Definitions of Protocol Status
4.2. プロトコル状態の定義
This document lists a "requirement level" or STATUS for each
protocol. The status is one of "required", "recommended",
"elective", "limited use", or "not recommended".
このドキュメントは各プロトコルのために「要件レベル」かSTATUSを記載します。 状態は1です。「お勧め」の、または、「選挙」の、または、「限られた使用」の、または、「お勧めでない」「必要」について。
4.2.1. Required Protocol
4.2.1. 必要なプロトコル
A system must implement the required protocols.
システムは必要なプロトコルを実行しなければなりません。
4.2.2. Recommended Protocol
4.2.2. お勧めのプロトコル
A system should implement the recommended protocols.
システムはお勧めのプロトコルを実行するはずです。
4.2.3. Elective Protocol
4.2.3. 選挙のプロトコル
A system may or may not implement an elective protocol. The
general notion is that if you are going to do something like this,
you must do exactly this. There may be several elective protocols
in a general area, for example, there are several electronic mail
protocols, and several routing protocols.
システムは選挙のプロトコルを実行するかもしれません。 一般的な概念はあなたがこのようにするなら、あなたがちょうどこれをしなければならないということです。 いくつかの選挙のプロトコルが一般的な領域にあるかもしれません、例えば、いくつかの電子メールプロトコル、およびいくつかのルーティング・プロトコルがあります。
4.2.4. Limited Use Protocol
4.2.4. 制限されて、プロトコルを使用してください。
These protocols are for use in limited circumstances. This may be
because of their experimental state, specialized nature, limited
functionality, or historic state.
これらのプロトコルは限られた事情における使用のためのものです。 これはそれらの実験州、専門化している自然、限られた機能性、または歴史的な状態のためにそうです。
4.2.5. Not Recommended Protocol
4.2.5. お勧めのプロトコルでない
These protocols are not recommended for general use. This may be
because of their limited functionality, specialized nature, or
experimental or historic state.
これらのプロトコルは一般的使用のために推薦されません。 これはそれらの限られた機能性、専門化している自然、または実験的であるか歴史的な状態のためにそうです。
Internet Architecture Board [Page 10] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会[10ページ]RFC1800インターネット規格1995年7月
5. The Standards Track
5. 標準化過程
This section discusses in more detail the procedures used by the RFC Editor and the IESG in making decisions about the labeling and publishing of protocols as standards.
このセクションはさらに詳細に規格としてプロトコルのラベリングと出版に関する決定をする際にRFC EditorとIESGによって用いられた手順について論じます。
5.1. The RFC Processing Decision Table
5.1. RFC処理決定表
Here is the current decision table for processing submissions by the RFC Editor. The processing depends on who submitted it, and the status they want it to have.
Here is the current decision table for processing submissions by the RFC Editor. The processing depends on who submitted it, and the status they want it to have.
+==========================================================+
|**************| S O U R C E |
+==========================================================+
| Desired | IAB | IESG | IRSG | Other |
| Status | | | | |
+==========================================================+
| | | | | |
| Standard | Bogus | Publish | Bogus | Bogus |
| or | (2) | (1) | (2) | (2) |
| Draft | | | | |
| Standard | | | | |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| | | | | |
| | Refer | Publish | Refer | Refer |
| Proposed | (3) | (1) | (3) | (3) |
| Standard | | | | |
| | | | | |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| | | | | |
| | Notify | Publish | Notify | Notify |
| Experimental | (4) | (1) | (4) | (4) |
| Protocol | | | | |
| | | | | |
+--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+
| | | | | |
| Information | Publish | Publish |Discretion|Discretion|
| or Opinion | (1) | (1) | (5) | (5) |
| Paper | | | | |
| | | | | |
+==========================================================+
+==========================================================+ |**************| S O U R C E | +==========================================================+ | Desired | IAB | IESG | IRSG | Other | | Status | | | | | +==========================================================+ | | | | | | | Standard | Bogus | Publish | Bogus | Bogus | | or | (2) | (1) | (2) | (2) | | Draft | | | | | | Standard | | | | | +--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+ | | | | | | | | Refer | Publish | Refer | Refer | | Proposed | (3) | (1) | (3) | (3) | | Standard | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+ | | | | | | | | Notify | Publish | Notify | Notify | | Experimental | (4) | (1) | (4) | (4) | | Protocol | | | | | | | | | | | +--------------+----------+----------+----------+----------+ | | | | | | | Information | Publish | Publish |Discretion|Discretion| | or Opinion | (1) | (1) | (5) | (5) | | Paper | | | | | | | | | | | +==========================================================+
(1) Publish.
(1) Publish.
(2) Bogus. Inform the source of the rules. RFCs specifying
Standard, or Draft Standard must come from the IESG, only.
(2) Bogus. Inform the source of the rules. RFCs specifying Standard, or Draft Standard must come from the IESG, only.
Internet Architecture Board [Page 11] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Internet Architecture Board [Page 11] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
(3) Refer to an Area Director for review by a WG. Expect to see
the document again only after approval by the IESG.
(3) Refer to an Area Director for review by a WG. Expect to see the document again only after approval by the IESG.
(4) Notify both the IESG and IRSG. If no concerns are raised in
two weeks then do Discretion (5), else RFC Editor to resolve
the concerns or do Refer (3).
(4) Notify both the IESG and IRSG. If no concerns are raised in two weeks then do Discretion (5), else RFC Editor to resolve the concerns or do Refer (3).
(5) RFC Editor's discretion. The RFC Editor decides if a review
is needed and if so by whom. RFC Editor decides to publish or
not.
(5) RFC Editor's discretion. The RFC Editor decides if a review is needed and if so by whom. RFC Editor decides to publish or not.
Of course, in all cases the RFC Editor can request or make minor changes for style, format, and presentation purposes.
Of course, in all cases the RFC Editor can request or make minor changes for style, format, and presentation purposes.
The IESG has designated the IESG Secretary as its agent for forwarding documents with IESG approval and for registering concerns in response to notifications (4) to the RFC Editor. Documents from Area Directors or Working Group Chairs may be considered in the same way as documents from "other".
The IESG has designated the IESG Secretary as its agent for forwarding documents with IESG approval and for registering concerns in response to notifications (4) to the RFC Editor. Documents from Area Directors or Working Group Chairs may be considered in the same way as documents from "other".
5.2. The Standards Track Diagram
5.2. The Standards Track Diagram
There is a part of the STATUS and STATE categorization that is called the standards track. Actually, only the changes of state are significant to the progression along the standards track, though the status assignments may change as well.
There is a part of the STATUS and STATE categorization that is called the standards track. Actually, only the changes of state are significant to the progression along the standards track, though the status assignments may change as well.
The states illustrated by single line boxes are temporary states, those illustrated by double line boxes are long term states. A protocol will normally be expected to remain in a temporary state for several months (minimum six months for proposed standard, minimum four months for draft standard). A protocol may be in a long term state for many years.
The states illustrated by single line boxes are temporary states, those illustrated by double line boxes are long term states. A protocol will normally be expected to remain in a temporary state for several months (minimum six months for proposed standard, minimum four months for draft standard). A protocol may be in a long term state for many years.
A protocol may enter the standards track only on the recommendation of the IESG; and may move from one state to another along the track only on the recommendation of the IESG. That is, it takes action by the IESG to either start a protocol on the track or to move it along.
A protocol may enter the standards track only on the recommendation of the IESG; and may move from one state to another along the track only on the recommendation of the IESG. That is, it takes action by the IESG to either start a protocol on the track or to move it along.
Generally, as the protocol enters the standards track a decision is made as to the eventual STATUS, requirement level or applicability (elective, recommended, or required) the protocol will have, although a somewhat less stringent current status may be assigned, and it then is placed in the the proposed standard STATE with that status. So the initial placement of a protocol is into state 1. At any time the STATUS decision may be revisited.
Generally, as the protocol enters the standards track a decision is made as to the eventual STATUS, requirement level or applicability (elective, recommended, or required) the protocol will have, although a somewhat less stringent current status may be assigned, and it then is placed in the the proposed standard STATE with that status. So the initial placement of a protocol is into state 1. At any time the STATUS decision may be revisited.
Internet Architecture Board [Page 12] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Internet Architecture Board [Page 12] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
|
+<----------------------------------------------+
| ^
V 0 | 4
+-----------+ +===========+
| enter |-->----------------+-------------->|experiment |
+-----------+ | +=====+=====+
| |
V 1 |
+-----------+ V
| proposed |-------------->+
+--->+-----+-----+ |
| | |
| V 2 |
+<---+-----+-----+ V
| draft std |-------------->+
+--->+-----+-----+ |
| | |
| V 3 |
+<---+=====+=====+ V
| standard |-------------->+
+=====+=====+ |
|
V 5
+=====+=====+
| historic |
+===========+
| +<----------------------------------------------+ | ^ V 0 | 4 +-----------+ +===========+ | enter |-->----------------+-------------->|experiment | +-----------+ | +=====+=====+ | | V 1 | +-----------+ V | proposed |-------------->+ +--->+-----+-----+ | | | | | V 2 | +<---+-----+-----+ V | draft std |-------------->+ +--->+-----+-----+ | | | | | V 3 | +<---+=====+=====+ V | standard |-------------->+ +=====+=====+ | | V 5 +=====+=====+ | historic | +===========+
The transition from proposed standard (1) to draft standard (2) can only be by action of the IESG and only after the protocol has been proposed standard (1) for at least six months.
The transition from proposed standard (1) to draft standard (2) can only be by action of the IESG and only after the protocol has been proposed standard (1) for at least six months.
The transition from draft standard (2) to standard (3) can only be by action of the IESG and only after the protocol has been draft standard (2) for at least four months.
The transition from draft standard (2) to standard (3) can only be by action of the IESG and only after the protocol has been draft standard (2) for at least four months.
Occasionally, the decision may be that the protocol is not ready for standardization and will be assigned to the experimental state (4). This is off the standards track, and the protocol may be resubmitted to enter the standards track after further work. There are other paths into the experimental and historic states that do not involve IESG action.
Occasionally, the decision may be that the protocol is not ready for standardization and will be assigned to the experimental state (4). This is off the standards track, and the protocol may be resubmitted to enter the standards track after further work. There are other paths into the experimental and historic states that do not involve IESG action.
Sometimes one protocol is replaced by another and thus becomes historic, or it may happen that a protocol on the standards track is in a sense overtaken by another protocol (or other events) and becomes historic (state 5).
Sometimes one protocol is replaced by another and thus becomes historic, or it may happen that a protocol on the standards track is in a sense overtaken by another protocol (or other events) and becomes historic (state 5).
Internet Architecture Board [Page 13] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Internet Architecture Board [Page 13] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
6. The Protocols
6. The Protocols
Subsection 6.1 lists recent RFCs and other changes. Subsections 6.2 - 6.10 list the standards in groups by protocol state.
Subsection 6.1 lists recent RFCs and other changes. Subsections 6.2 - 6.10 list the standards in groups by protocol state.
6.1. Recent Changes
6.1. Recent Changes
6.1.1. New RFCs:
6.1.1. New RFCs:
1814 - Unique Addresses are Good
1814 - Unique Addresses are Good
This is an information document and does not specify any
level of standard.
This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard.
1813 - NFS Version 3 Protocol Specification
1813 - NFS Version 3 Protocol Specification
This is an information document and does not specify any
level of standard.
This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard.
1812 - Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers
1812 - Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers
A Proposed Standard protocol.
A Proposed Standard protocol.
1811 - U.S. Government Internet Domain Names
1811 - U.S. Government Internet Domain Names
This is an information document and does not specify any
level of standard.
This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard.
1810 - Report on MD5 Performance
1810 - Report on MD5 Performance
This is an information document and does not specify any
level of standard.
This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard.
1809 - Using the Flow Label Field in IPv6
1809 - Using the Flow Label Field in IPv6
This is an information document and does not specify any
level of standard.
This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard.
1808 - Relative Uniform Resource Locators
1808 - Relative Uniform Resource Locators
A Proposed Standard protocol.
A Proposed Standard protocol.
1807 - A Format for Bibliographic Records
1807 - A Format for Bibliographic Records
This is an information document and does not specify any
level of standard.
This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard.
Internet Architecture Board [Page 14] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Internet Architecture Board [Page 14] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
1806 - Communicating Presentation Information in Internet
Messages: The Content-Disposition Header
1806 - Communicating Presentation Information in Internet Messages: The Content-Disposition Header
An Experimental protocol.
An Experimental protocol.
1805 - Location-Independent Data/Software Integrity Protocol
1805 - Location-Independent Data/Software Integrity Protocol
This is an information document and does not specify any
level of standard.
This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard.
1804 - Schema Publishing in X.500 Directory
1804 - Schema Publishing in X.500 Directory
An Experimental protocol.
An Experimental protocol.
1803 - Recommendations for an X.500 Production Directory Service
1803 - Recommendations for an X.500 Production Directory Service
This is an information document and does not specify any
level of standard.
This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard.
1802 - Introducing Project Long Bud: Internet Pilot Project for
the Deployment of X.500 Directory Information in Support of
X.400 Routing
1802 - Introducing Project Long Bud: Internet Pilot Project for the Deployment of X.500 Directory Information in Support of X.400 Routing
This is an information document and does not specify any
level of standard.
This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard.
1801 - X.400-MHS use of the X.500 Directory to support X.400-MHS
Routing
1801 - X.400-MHS use of the X.500 Directory to support X.400-MHS Routing
An Experimental protocol.
An Experimental protocol.
1800 - Internet Official Protocol Standards
1800 - Internet Official Protocol Standards
This memo.
This memo.
1799 - Not yet issued.
1799 - Not yet issued.
1798 - Connection-less Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
1798 - Connection-less Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
A Proposed Standard protocol.
A Proposed Standard protocol.
1797 - Class A Subnet Experiment
1797 - Class A Subnet Experiment
An Experimental protocol.
An Experimental protocol.
Internet Architecture Board [Page 15] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Internet Architecture Board [Page 15] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
1796 - Not All RFCs are Standards
1796 - Not All RFCs are Standards
This is an information document and does not specify any
level of standard.
This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard.
1795 - Data Link Switching: Switch-to-Switch Protocol AIW DLSw
RIG: DLSw Closed Pages, DLSw Standard Version 1
1795 - Data Link Switching: Switch-to-Switch Protocol AIW DLSw RIG: DLSw Closed Pages, DLSw Standard Version 1
This is an information document and does not specify any
level of standard.
This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard.
1794 - DNS Support for Load Balancing
1794 - DNS Support for Load Balancing
This is an information document and does not specify any
level of standard.
This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard.
1793 - Extending OSPF to Support Demand Circuits
1793 - Extending OSPF to Support Demand Circuits
A Proposed Standard protocol.
A Proposed Standard protocol.
1792 - TCP/IPX Connection Mib Specification
1792 - TCP/IPX Connection Mib Specification
An Experimental protocol.
An Experimental protocol.
1791 - TCP And UDP Over IPX Networks With Fixed Path MTU
1791 - TCP And UDP Over IPX Networks With Fixed Path MTU
An Experimental protocol.
An Experimental protocol.
1790 - An Agreement between the Internet Society and Sun
Microsystems, Inc. in the Matter of ONC RPC and XDR
Protocols
1790 - An Agreement between the Internet Society and Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the Matter of ONC RPC and XDR Protocols
This is an information document and does not specify any
level of standard.
This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard.
1789 - INETPhone: Telephone Services and Servers on Internet
1789 - INETPhone: Telephone Services and Servers on Internet
This is an information document and does not specify any
level of standard.
This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard.
1788 - ICMP Domain Name Messages
1788 - ICMP Domain Name Messages
An Experimental protocol.
An Experimental protocol.
1787 - Routing in a Multi-provider Internet
1787 - Routing in a Multi-provider Internet
This is an information document and does not specify any
level of standard.
This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard.
Internet Architecture Board [Page 16] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Internet Architecture Board [Page 16] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
1776 - The Address is the Message
1776 - The Address is the Message
This is an information document and does not specify any
level of standard.
This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard.
6.1.2. Other Changes:
6.1.2. Other Changes:
The following are changes to protocols listed in the previous edition.
The following are changes to protocols listed in the previous edition.
1268 - Application of the Border Gateway Protocol in the Internet
1268 - Application of the Border Gateway Protocol in the Internet
Moved to Historic.
Moved to Historic.
1267 - A Border Gateway Protocol 3 (BGP-3)
1267 - A Border Gateway Protocol 3 (BGP-3)
Moved to Historic.
Moved to Historic.
1209 - The Transmission of IP Datagrams over the SMDS Service
1209 - The Transmission of IP Datagrams over the SMDS Service
Elevated to Standard.
Elevated to Standard.
Internet Architecture Board [Page 17] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Internet Architecture Board [Page 17] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
6.2. Standard Protocols
6.2. Standard Protocols
Protocol Name Status RFC STD *
======== ===================================== ======== ==== === =
-------- Internet Official Protocol Standards Req 1800 1
-------- Assigned Numbers Req 1700 2
-------- Host Requirements - Communications Req 1122 3
-------- Host Requirements - Applications Req 1123 3
IP Internet Protocol Req 791 5
as amended by:--------
-------- IP Subnet Extension Req 950 5
-------- IP Broadcast Datagrams Req 919 5
-------- IP Broadcast Datagrams with Subnets Req 922 5
ICMP Internet Control Message Protocol Req 792 5
IGMP Internet Group Multicast Protocol Rec 1112 5
UDP User Datagram Protocol Rec 768 6
TCP Transmission Control Protocol Rec 793 7
TELNET Telnet Protocol Rec 854,855 8
FTP File Transfer Protocol Rec 959 9
SMTP Simple Mail Transfer Protocol Rec 821 10
MAIL Format of Electronic Mail Messages Rec 822 11
CONTENT Content Type Header Field Rec 1049 11
NTPV2 Network Time Protocol (Version 2) Rec 1119 12
DOMAIN Domain Name System Rec 1034,1035 13
DNS-MX Mail Routing and the Domain System Rec 974 14
SNMP Simple Network Management Protocol Rec 1157 15
SMI Structure of Management Information Rec 1155 16
Concise-MIB Concise MIB Definitions Rec 1212 16
MIB-II Management Information Base-II Rec 1213 17
NETBIOS NetBIOS Service Protocols Ele 1001,1002 19
ECHO Echo Protocol Rec 862 20
DISCARD Discard Protocol Ele 863 21
CHARGEN Character Generator Protocol Ele 864 22
QUOTE Quote of the Day Protocol Ele 865 23
USERS Active Users Protocol Ele 866 24
DAYTIME Daytime Protocol Ele 867 25
TIME Time Server Protocol Ele 868 26
TFTP Trivial File Transfer Protocol Ele 1350 33
RIP Routing Information Protocol Ele 1058 34
TP-TCP ISO Transport Service on top of the TCP Ele 1006 35
ETHER-MIB Ethernet MIB Ele 1643 50
PPP Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Ele 1661 51
PPP-HDLC PPP in HDLC Framing Ele 1662 51
Protocol Name Status RFC STD * ======== ===================================== ======== ==== === = -------- Internet Official Protocol Standards Req 1800 1 -------- Assigned Numbers Req 1700 2 -------- Host Requirements - Communications Req 1122 3 -------- Host Requirements - Applications Req 1123 3 IP Internet Protocol Req 791 5 as amended by:-------- -------- IP Subnet Extension Req 950 5 -------- IP Broadcast Datagrams Req 919 5 -------- IP Broadcast Datagrams with Subnets Req 922 5 ICMP Internet Control Message Protocol Req 792 5 IGMP Internet Group Multicast Protocol Rec 1112 5 UDP User Datagram Protocol Rec 768 6 TCP Transmission Control Protocol Rec 793 7 TELNET Telnet Protocol Rec 854,855 8 FTP File Transfer Protocol Rec 959 9 SMTP Simple Mail Transfer Protocol Rec 821 10 MAIL Format of Electronic Mail Messages Rec 822 11 CONTENT Content Type Header Field Rec 1049 11 NTPV2 Network Time Protocol (Version 2) Rec 1119 12 DOMAIN Domain Name System Rec 1034,1035 13 DNS-MX Mail Routing and the Domain System Rec 974 14 SNMP Simple Network Management Protocol Rec 1157 15 SMI Structure of Management Information Rec 1155 16 Concise-MIB Concise MIB Definitions Rec 1212 16 MIB-II Management Information Base-II Rec 1213 17 NETBIOS NetBIOS Service Protocols Ele 1001,1002 19 ECHO Echo Protocol Rec 862 20 DISCARD Discard Protocol Ele 863 21 CHARGEN Character Generator Protocol Ele 864 22 QUOTE Quote of the Day Protocol Ele 865 23 USERS Active Users Protocol Ele 866 24 DAYTIME Daytime Protocol Ele 867 25 TIME Time Server Protocol Ele 868 26 TFTP Trivial File Transfer Protocol Ele 1350 33 RIP Routing Information Protocol Ele 1058 34 TP-TCP ISO Transport Service on top of the TCP Ele 1006 35 ETHER-MIB Ethernet MIB Ele 1643 50 PPP Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) Ele 1661 51 PPP-HDLC PPP in HDLC Framing Ele 1662 51
[Note: an asterisk at the end of a line indicates a change from the previous edition of this document.]
[Note: an asterisk at the end of a line indicates a change from the previous edition of this document.]
Internet Architecture Board [Page 18] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Internet Architecture Board [Page 18] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Applicability Statements:
Applicability Statements:
IGMP -- The Internet Architecture Board intends to move towards general adoption of IP multicasting, as a more efficient solution than broadcasting for many applications. The host interface has been standardized in RFC-1112; however, multicast-routing gateways are in the experimental stage and are not widely available. An Internet host should support all of RFC-1112, except for the IGMP protocol itself which is optional; see RFC-1122 for more details. Even without IGMP, implementation of RFC-1112 will provide an important advance: IP-layer access to local network multicast addressing. It is expected that IGMP will become recommended for all hosts and gateways at some future date.
IGMP -- The Internet Architecture Board intends to move towards general adoption of IP multicasting, as a more efficient solution than broadcasting for many applications. The host interface has been standardized in RFC-1112; however, multicast-routing gateways are in the experimental stage and are not widely available. An Internet host should support all of RFC-1112, except for the IGMP protocol itself which is optional; see RFC-1122 for more details. Even without IGMP, implementation of RFC-1112 will provide an important advance: IP-layer access to local network multicast addressing. It is expected that IGMP will become recommended for all hosts and gateways at some future date.
SMI, MIB-II SNMP -- The Internet Architecture Board recommends that all IP and TCP implementations be network manageable. At the current time, this implies implementation of the Internet MIB-II (RFC-1213), and at least the recommended management protocol SNMP (RFC-1157).
SMI, MIB-II SNMP -- The Internet Architecture Board recommends that all IP and TCP implementations be network manageable. At the current time, this implies implementation of the Internet MIB-II (RFC-1213), and at least the recommended management protocol SNMP (RFC-1157).
RIP -- The Routing Information Protocol (RIP) is widely implemented and used in the Internet. However, both implementors and users should be aware that RIP has some serious technical limitations as a routing protocol. The IETF is currently devpeloping several candidates for a new standard "open" routing protocol with better properties than RIP. The IAB urges the Internet community to track these developments, and to implement the new protocol when it is standardized; improved Internet service will result for many users.
RIP -- The Routing Information Protocol (RIP) is widely implemented and used in the Internet. However, both implementors and users should be aware that RIP has some serious technical limitations as a routing protocol. The IETF is currently devpeloping several candidates for a new standard "open" routing protocol with better properties than RIP. The IAB urges the Internet community to track these developments, and to implement the new protocol when it is standardized; improved Internet service will result for many users.
TP-TCP -- As OSI protocols become more widely implemented and used, there will be an increasing need to support interoperation with the TCP/IP protocols. The Internet Engineering Task Force is formulating strategies for interoperation. RFC-1006 provides one interoperation mode, in which TCP/IP is used to emulate TP0 in order to support OSI applications. Hosts that wish to run OSI connection-oriented applications in this mode should use the procedure described in RFC- 1006. In the future, the IAB expects that a major portion of the Internet will support both TCP/IP and OSI (inter-)network protocols in parallel, and it will then be possible to run OSI applications across the Internet using full OSI protocol "stacks".
TP-TCP -- As OSI protocols become more widely implemented and used, there will be an increasing need to support interoperation with the TCP/IP protocols. The Internet Engineering Task Force is formulating strategies for interoperation. RFC-1006 provides one interoperation mode, in which TCP/IP is used to emulate TP0 in order to support OSI applications. Hosts that wish to run OSI connection-oriented applications in this mode should use the procedure described in RFC- 1006. In the future, the IAB expects that a major portion of the Internet will support both TCP/IP and OSI (inter-)network protocols in parallel, and it will then be possible to run OSI applications across the Internet using full OSI protocol "stacks".
Internet Architecture Board [Page 19] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Internet Architecture Board [Page 19] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
6.3. Network-Specific Standard Protocols
6.3. Network-Specific Standard Protocols
All Network-Specific Standards have Elective status.
All Network-Specific Standards have Elective status.
Protocol Name State RFC STD * ======== ===================================== ===== ===== === = IP-ATM Classical IP and ARP over ATM Prop 1577 IP-FR Multiprotocol over Frame Relay Draft 1490 ATM-ENCAP Multiprotocol Encapsulation over ATM Prop 1483 IP-TR-MC IP Multicast over Token-Ring LANs Prop 1469 IP-FDDI Transmission of IP and ARP over FDDI Net Std 1390 36 IP-HIPPI IP and ARP on HIPPI Prop 1374 IP-X.25 X.25 and ISDN in the Packet Mode Draft 1356 IP-FDDI Internet Protocol on FDDI Networks Draft 1188 ARP Address Resolution Protocol Std 826 37 RARP A Reverse Address Resolution Protocol Std 903 38 IP-ARPA Internet Protocol on ARPANET Std BBN1822 39 IP-WB Internet Protocol on Wideband Network Std 907 40 IP-E Internet Protocol on Ethernet Networks Std 894 41 IP-EE Internet Protocol on Exp. Ethernet Nets Std 895 42 IP-IEEE Internet Protocol on IEEE 802 Std 1042 43 IP-DC Internet Protocol on DC Networks Std 891 44 IP-HC Internet Protocol on Hyperchannel Std 1044 45 IP-ARC Transmitting IP Traffic over ARCNET Nets Std 1201 46 IP-SLIP Transmission of IP over Serial Lines Std 1055 47 IP-NETBIOS Transmission of IP over NETBIOS Std 1088 48 IP-IPX Transmission of 802.2 over IPX Networks Std 1132 49 IP-SMDS IP Datagrams over the SMDS Service Std 1209 52*
Protocol Name State RFC STD * ======== ===================================== ===== ===== === = IP-ATM Classical IP and ARP over ATM Prop 1577 IP-FR Multiprotocol over Frame Relay Draft 1490 ATM-ENCAP Multiprotocol Encapsulation over ATM Prop 1483 IP-TR-MC IP Multicast over Token-Ring LANs Prop 1469 IP-FDDI Transmission of IP and ARP over FDDI Net Std 1390 36 IP-HIPPI IP and ARP on HIPPI Prop 1374 IP-X.25 X.25 and ISDN in the Packet Mode Draft 1356 IP-FDDI Internet Protocol on FDDI Networks Draft 1188 ARP Address Resolution Protocol Std 826 37 RARP A Reverse Address Resolution Protocol Std 903 38 IP-ARPA Internet Protocol on ARPANET Std BBN1822 39 IP-WB Internet Protocol on Wideband Network Std 907 40 IP-E Internet Protocol on Ethernet Networks Std 894 41 IP-EE Internet Protocol on Exp. Ethernet Nets Std 895 42 IP-IEEE Internet Protocol on IEEE 802 Std 1042 43 IP-DC Internet Protocol on DC Networks Std 891 44 IP-HC Internet Protocol on Hyperchannel Std 1044 45 IP-ARC Transmitting IP Traffic over ARCNET Nets Std 1201 46 IP-SLIP Transmission of IP over Serial Lines Std 1055 47 IP-NETBIOS Transmission of IP over NETBIOS Std 1088 48 IP-IPX Transmission of 802.2 over IPX Networks Std 1132 49 IP-SMDS IP Datagrams over the SMDS Service Std 1209 52*
[Note: an asterisk at the end of a line indicates a change from the previous edition of this document.]
[Note: an asterisk at the end of a line indicates a change from the previous edition of this document.]
Applicability Statements:
Applicability Statements:
It is expected that a system will support one or more physical
networks and for each physical network supported the appropriate
protocols from the above list must be supported. That is, it is
elective to support any particular type of physical network, and for
the physical networks actually supported it is required that they be
supported exactly according to the protocols in the above list. See
also the Host and Gateway Requirements RFCs for more specific
information on network-specific ("link layer") protocols.
It is expected that a system will support one or more physical networks and for each physical network supported the appropriate protocols from the above list must be supported. That is, it is elective to support any particular type of physical network, and for the physical networks actually supported it is required that they be supported exactly according to the protocols in the above list. See also the Host and Gateway Requirements RFCs for more specific information on network-specific ("link layer") protocols.
Internet Architecture Board [Page 20] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Internet Architecture Board [Page 20] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
6.4. Draft Standard Protocols
6.4. Draft Standard Protocols
Protocol Name Status RFC ======== ===================================== ============== ===== STR-REP String Representation ... Elective 1779 X.500syn X.500 String Representation ... Elective 1778 X.500lite X.500 Lightweight ... Elective 1777 BGP-4-APP Application of BGP-4 Elective 1772 BGP-4 Border Gateway Protocol 4 Elective 1771 PPP-DNCP PPP DECnet Phase IV Control Protocol Elective 1762 RMON-MIB Remote Network Monitoring MIB Elective 1757 802.5-MIB IEEE 802.5 Token Ring MIB Elective 1748 BGP-4-MIB BGP-4 MIB Elective 1657 POP3 Post Office Protocol, Version 3 Elective 1725 RIP2-MIB RIP Version 2 MIB Extension Elective 1724 RIP2 RIP Version 2-Carrying Additional Info. Elective 1723 RIP2-APP RIP Version 2 Protocol App. Statement Elective 1722 SIP-MIB SIP Interface Type MIB Elective 1694 ------- Def Man Objs Parallel-printer-like Elective 1660 ------- Def Man Objs RS-232-like Elective 1659 ------- Def Man Objs Character Stream Elective 1658 SMTP-SIZE SMTP Service Ext for Message Size Elective 1653 SMTP-8BIT SMTP Service Ext or 8bit-MIMEtransport Elective 1652 SMTP-EXT SMTP Service Extensions Elective 1651 OSI-NSAP Guidelines for OSI NSAP Allocation Elective 1629 OSPF2 Open Shortest Path First Routing V2 Elective 1583 ISO-TS-ECHO Echo for ISO-8473 Elective 1575 DECNET-MIB DECNET MIB Elective 1559 ------- Message Header Ext. of Non-ASCII Text Elective 1522 MIME Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions Elective 1521 802.3-MIB IEEE 802.3 Repeater MIB Elective 1516 BRIDGE-MIB BRIDGE-MIB Elective 1493 NTPV3 Network Time Protocol (Version 3) Elective 1305 IP-MTU Path MTU Discovery Elective 1191 FINGER Finger Protocol Elective 1288 BOOTP Bootstrap Protocol Recommended 951,1497 NICNAME WhoIs Protocol Elective 954
Protocol Name Status RFC ======== ===================================== ============== ===== STR-REP String Representation ... Elective 1779 X.500syn X.500 String Representation ... Elective 1778 X.500lite X.500 Lightweight ... Elective 1777 BGP-4-APP Application of BGP-4 Elective 1772 BGP-4 Border Gateway Protocol 4 Elective 1771 PPP-DNCP PPP DECnet Phase IV Control Protocol Elective 1762 RMON-MIB Remote Network Monitoring MIB Elective 1757 802.5-MIB IEEE 802.5 Token Ring MIB Elective 1748 BGP-4-MIB BGP-4 MIB Elective 1657 POP3 Post Office Protocol, Version 3 Elective 1725 RIP2-MIB RIP Version 2 MIB Extension Elective 1724 RIP2 RIP Version 2-Carrying Additional Info. Elective 1723 RIP2-APP RIP Version 2 Protocol App. Statement Elective 1722 SIP-MIB SIP Interface Type MIB Elective 1694 ------- Def Man Objs Parallel-printer-like Elective 1660 ------- Def Man Objs RS-232-like Elective 1659 ------- Def Man Objs Character Stream Elective 1658 SMTP-SIZE SMTP Service Ext for Message Size Elective 1653 SMTP-8BIT SMTP Service Ext or 8bit-MIMEtransport Elective 1652 SMTP-EXT SMTP Service Extensions Elective 1651 OSI-NSAP Guidelines for OSI NSAP Allocation Elective 1629 OSPF2 Open Shortest Path First Routing V2 Elective 1583 ISO-TS-ECHO Echo for ISO-8473 Elective 1575 DECNET-MIB DECNET MIB Elective 1559 ------- Message Header Ext. of Non-ASCII Text Elective 1522 MIME Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions Elective 1521 802.3-MIB IEEE 802.3 Repeater MIB Elective 1516 BRIDGE-MIB BRIDGE-MIB Elective 1493 NTPV3 Network Time Protocol (Version 3) Elective 1305 IP-MTU Path MTU Discovery Elective 1191 FINGER Finger Protocol Elective 1288 BOOTP Bootstrap Protocol Recommended 951,1497 NICNAME WhoIs Protocol Elective 954
[Note: an asterisk at the end of a line indicates a change from the previous edition of this document.]
[Note: an asterisk at the end of a line indicates a change from the previous edition of this document.]
Applicability Statements:
Applicability Statements:
PPP -- Point to Point Protocol is a method of sending IP over serial lines, which are a type of physical network. It is anticipated that PPP will be advanced to the network-specifics standard protocol state in the future.
PPP -- Point to Point Protocol is a method of sending IP over serial lines, which are a type of physical network. It is anticipated that PPP will be advanced to the network-specifics standard protocol state in the future.
Internet Architecture Board [Page 21] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Internet Architecture Board [Page 21] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
6.5. Proposed Standard Protocols
6.5. Proposed Standard Protocols
Protocol Name Status RFC ======== ===================================== ============== ===== RREQ Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers Elective 1812* URL Relative Uniform Resource Locators Elective 1808* CLDAP Connection-less LDAP Elective 1798* OSPF-DC Ext. OSPF to Support Demand Circuits Elective 1793* TMUX Transport Multiplexing Protocol Elective 1692* TFTP-Opt TFTP Options Elective 1784 TFTP-Blk TFTP Blocksize Option Elective 1783 TFTP-Ext TFTP Option Extension Elective 1782 OSI-Dir OSI User Friendly Naming ... Elective 1781 MIME-EDI MIME Encapsulation of EDI Objects Elective 1767 Lang-Tag Tags for Identification of Languages Elective 1766 XNSCP PPP XNS IDP Control Protocol Elective 1764 BVCP PPP Banyan Vines Control Protocol Elective 1763 Print-MIB Printer MIB Elective 1759 ATM-SIG ATM Signaling Support for IP over ATM Elective 1755 IPNG Recommendation for IP Next Generation Elective 1752 802.5-SSR 802.5 SSR MIB using SMIv2 Elective 1749 SDLCSMIv2 SNADLC SDLC MIB using SMIv2 Elective 1747 BGP4/IDRP BGP4/IDRP for IP/OSPF Interaction Elective 1745 AT-MIB Appletalk MIB Elective 1742 MacMIME MIME Encapsulation of Macintosh files Elective 1740 URL Uniform Resource Locators Elective 1738 POP3-AUTH POP3 AUTHentication command Elective 1734 IMAP4-AUTH IMAP4 Authentication Mechanisms Elective 1731 IMAP4 Internet Message Access Protocol V4 Elective 1730 PPP-MP PPP Multilink Protocol Elective 1717 RDBMS-MIB RDMS MIB - using SMIv2 Elective 1697 MODEM-MIB Modem MIB - using SMIv2 Elective 1696 ATM-MIB ATM Management Version 8.0 using SMIv2 Elective 1695 SNANAU-MIB SNA NAUs MIB using SMIv2 Elective 1665 PPP-TRANS PPP Reliable Transmission Elective 1663 BGP-4-IMP BGP-4 Roadmap and Implementation Elective 1656 -------- Postmaster Convention X.400 Operations Elective 1648 TN3270-En TN3270 Enhancements Elective 1647 PPP-BCP PPP Bridging Control Protocol Elective 1638 UPS-MIB UPS Management Information Base Elective 1628 AAL5-MTU Default IP MTU for use over ATM AAL5 Elective 1626 PPP-SONET PPP over SONET/SDH Elective 1619 PPP-ISDN PPP over ISDN Elective 1618 DNS-R-MIB DNS Resolver MIB Extensions Elective 1612 DNS-S-MIB DNS Server MIB Extensions Elective 1611 FR-MIB Frame Relay Service MIB Elective 1604 PPP-X25 PPP in X.25 Elective 1598 OSPF-NSSA The OSPF NSSA Option Elective 1587
Protocol Name Status RFC ======== ===================================== ============== ===== RREQ Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers Elective 1812* URL Relative Uniform Resource Locators Elective 1808* CLDAP Connection-less LDAP Elective 1798* OSPF-DC Ext. OSPF to Support Demand Circuits Elective 1793* TMUX Transport Multiplexing Protocol Elective 1692* TFTP-Opt TFTP Options Elective 1784 TFTP-Blk TFTP Blocksize Option Elective 1783 TFTP-Ext TFTP Option Extension Elective 1782 OSI-Dir OSI User Friendly Naming ... Elective 1781 MIME-EDI MIME Encapsulation of EDI Objects Elective 1767 Lang-Tag Tags for Identification of Languages Elective 1766 XNSCP PPP XNS IDP Control Protocol Elective 1764 BVCP PPP Banyan Vines Control Protocol Elective 1763 Print-MIB Printer MIB Elective 1759 ATM-SIG ATM Signaling Support for IP over ATM Elective 1755 IPNG Recommendation for IP Next Generation Elective 1752 802.5-SSR 802.5 SSR MIB using SMIv2 Elective 1749 SDLCSMIv2 SNADLC SDLC MIB using SMIv2 Elective 1747 BGP4/IDRP BGP4/IDRP for IP/OSPF Interaction Elective 1745 AT-MIB Appletalk MIB Elective 1742 MacMIME MIME Encapsulation of Macintosh files Elective 1740 URL Uniform Resource Locators Elective 1738 POP3-AUTH POP3 AUTHentication command Elective 1734 IMAP4-AUTH IMAP4 Authentication Mechanisms Elective 1731 IMAP4 Internet Message Access Protocol V4 Elective 1730 PPP-MP PPP Multilink Protocol Elective 1717 RDBMS-MIB RDMS MIB - using SMIv2 Elective 1697 MODEM-MIB Modem MIB - using SMIv2 Elective 1696 ATM-MIB ATM Management Version 8.0 using SMIv2 Elective 1695 SNANAU-MIB SNA NAUs MIB using SMIv2 Elective 1665 PPP-TRANS PPP Reliable Transmission Elective 1663 BGP-4-IMP BGP-4 Roadmap and Implementation Elective 1656 -------- Postmaster Convention X.400 Operations Elective 1648 TN3270-En TN3270 Enhancements Elective 1647 PPP-BCP PPP Bridging Control Protocol Elective 1638 UPS-MIB UPS Management Information Base Elective 1628 AAL5-MTU Default IP MTU for use over ATM AAL5 Elective 1626 PPP-SONET PPP over SONET/SDH Elective 1619 PPP-ISDN PPP over ISDN Elective 1618 DNS-R-MIB DNS Resolver MIB Extensions Elective 1612 DNS-S-MIB DNS Server MIB Extensions Elective 1611 FR-MIB Frame Relay Service MIB Elective 1604 PPP-X25 PPP in X.25 Elective 1598 OSPF-NSSA The OSPF NSSA Option Elective 1587
Internet Architecture Board [Page 22] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Internet Architecture Board [Page 22] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
OSPF-Multi Multicast Extensions to OSPF Elective 1584 SONET-MIB MIB SONET/SDH Interface Type Elective 1595 RIP-DC Extensions to RIP to Support Demand Cir. Elective 1582 -------- Evolution of the Interfaces Group of MIB-II Elective 1573 PPP-LCP PPP LCP Extensions Elective 1570 X500-MIB X.500 Directory Monitoring MIB Elective 1567 MAIL-MIB Mail Monitoring MIB Elective 1566 NSM-MIB Network Services Monitoring MIB Elective 1565 CIPX Compressing IPX Headers Over WAM Media Elective 1553 IPXCP PPP Internetworking Packet Exchange Control Elective 1552 CON-MD5 Content-MD5 Header Field Elective 1544 DHCP-BOOTP Interoperation Between DHCP and BOOTP Elective 1534 DHCP-BOOTP DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor Extensions Elective 1533 BOOTP Clarifications and Extensions BOOTP Elective 1532 DHCP Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Elective 1541* SRB-MIB Source Routing Bridge MIB Elective 1525 CIDR-STRA CIDR Address Assignment... Elective 1519 CIDR-ARCH CIDR Architecture... Elective 1518 CIDR-APP CIDR Applicability Statement Elective 1517 -------- 802.3 MAU MIB Elective 1515 HOST-MIB Host Resources MIB Elective 1514 -------- Token Ring Extensions to RMON MIB Elective 1513 FDDI-MIB FDDI Management Information Base Elective 1512 KERBEROS Kerberos Network Authentication Ser (V5) Elective 1510 GSSAPI Generic Security Service API: C-bindings Elective 1509 GSSAPI Generic Security Service Application... Elective 1508 DASS Distributed Authentication Security... Elective 1507 -------- X.400 Use of Extended Character Sets Elective 1502 HARPOON Rules for Downgrading Messages... Elective 1496 Mapping MHS/RFC-822 Message Body Mapping Elective 1495 Equiv X.400/MIME Body Equivalences Elective 1494 IDPR Inter-Domain Policy Routing Protocol Elective 1479 IDPR-ARCH Architecture for IDPR Elective 1478 PPP/Bridge MIB Bridge PPP MIB Elective 1474 PPP/IP MIB IP Network Control Protocol of PPP MIB Elective 1473 PPP/SEC MIB Security Protocols of PPP MIB Elective 1472 PPP/LCP MIB Link Control Protocol of PPP MIB Elective 1471 X25-MIB Multiprotocol Interconnect on X.25 MIB Elective 1461 SNMPv2 Coexistence between SNMPv1 and SNMPv2 Elective 1452 SNMPv2 Manager-to-Manager MIB Elective 1451 SNMPv2 Management Information Base for SNMPv2 Elective 1450 SNMPv2 Transport Mappings for SNMPv2 Elective 1449 SNMPv2 Protocol Operations for SNMPv2 Elective 1448 SNMPv2 Party MIB for SNMPv2 Elective 1447 SNMPv2 Security Protocols for SNMPv2 Elective 1446 SNMPv2 Administrative Model for SNMPv2 Elective 1445 SNMPv2 Conformance Statements for SNMPv2 Elective 1444 SNMPv2 Textual Conventions for SNMPv2 Elective 1443
OSPF-Multi Multicast Extensions to OSPF Elective 1584 SONET-MIB MIB SONET/SDH Interface Type Elective 1595 RIP-DC Extensions to RIP to Support Demand Cir. Elective 1582 -------- Evolution of the Interfaces Group of MIB-II Elective 1573 PPP-LCP PPP LCP Extensions Elective 1570 X500-MIB X.500 Directory Monitoring MIB Elective 1567 MAIL-MIB Mail Monitoring MIB Elective 1566 NSM-MIB Network Services Monitoring MIB Elective 1565 CIPX Compressing IPX Headers Over WAM Media Elective 1553 IPXCP PPP Internetworking Packet Exchange Control Elective 1552 CON-MD5 Content-MD5 Header Field Elective 1544 DHCP-BOOTP Interoperation Between DHCP and BOOTP Elective 1534 DHCP-BOOTP DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor Extensions Elective 1533 BOOTP Clarifications and Extensions BOOTP Elective 1532 DHCP Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol Elective 1541* SRB-MIB Source Routing Bridge MIB Elective 1525 CIDR-STRA CIDR Address Assignment... Elective 1519 CIDR-ARCH CIDR Architecture... Elective 1518 CIDR-APP CIDR Applicability Statement Elective 1517 -------- 802.3 MAU MIB Elective 1515 HOST-MIB Host Resources MIB Elective 1514 -------- Token Ring Extensions to RMON MIB Elective 1513 FDDI-MIB FDDI Management Information Base Elective 1512 KERBEROS Kerberos Network Authentication Ser (V5) Elective 1510 GSSAPI Generic Security Service API: C-bindings Elective 1509 GSSAPI Generic Security Service Application... Elective 1508 DASS Distributed Authentication Security... Elective 1507 -------- X.400 Use of Extended Character Sets Elective 1502 HARPOON Rules for Downgrading Messages... Elective 1496 Mapping MHS/RFC-822 Message Body Mapping Elective 1495 Equiv X.400/MIME Body Equivalences Elective 1494 IDPR Inter-Domain Policy Routing Protocol Elective 1479 IDPR-ARCH Architecture for IDPR Elective 1478 PPP/Bridge MIB Bridge PPP MIB Elective 1474 PPP/IP MIB IP Network Control Protocol of PPP MIB Elective 1473 PPP/SEC MIB Security Protocols of PPP MIB Elective 1472 PPP/LCP MIB Link Control Protocol of PPP MIB Elective 1471 X25-MIB Multiprotocol Interconnect on X.25 MIB Elective 1461 SNMPv2 Coexistence between SNMPv1 and SNMPv2 Elective 1452 SNMPv2 Manager-to-Manager MIB Elective 1451 SNMPv2 Management Information Base for SNMPv2 Elective 1450 SNMPv2 Transport Mappings for SNMPv2 Elective 1449 SNMPv2 Protocol Operations for SNMPv2 Elective 1448 SNMPv2 Party MIB for SNMPv2 Elective 1447 SNMPv2 Security Protocols for SNMPv2 Elective 1446 SNMPv2 Administrative Model for SNMPv2 Elective 1445 SNMPv2 Conformance Statements for SNMPv2 Elective 1444 SNMPv2 Textual Conventions for SNMPv2 Elective 1443
Internet Architecture Board [Page 23] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Internet Architecture Board [Page 23] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
SNMPv2 SMI for SNMPv2 Elective 1442 SNMPv2 Introduction to SNMPv2 Elective 1441 PEM-KEY PEM - Key Certification Elective 1424 PEM-ALG PEM - Algorithms, Modes, and Identifiers Elective 1423 PEM-CKM PEM - Certificate-Based Key Management Elective 1422 PEM-ENC PEM - Message Encryption and Auth Elective 1421 SNMP-IPX SNMP over IPX Elective 1420 SNMP-AT SNMP over AppleTalk Elective 1419 SNMP-OSI SNMP over OSI Elective 1418 FTP-FTAM FTP-FTAM Gateway Specification Elective 1415 IDENT-MIB Identification MIB Elective 1414 IDENT Identification Protocol Elective 1413 DS3/E3-MIB DS3/E3 Interface Type Elective 1407 DS1/E1-MIB DS1/E1 Interface Type Elective 1406 BGP-OSPF BGP OSPF Interaction Elective 1403 -------- Route Advertisement In BGP2 And BGP3 Elective 1397 SNMP-X.25 SNMP MIB Extension for X.25 Packet Layer Elective 1382 SNMP-LAPB SNMP MIB Extension for X.25 LAPB Elective 1381 PPP-ATCP PPP AppleTalk Control Protocol Elective 1378 PPP-OSINLCP PPP OSI Network Layer Control Protocol Elective 1377 TABLE-MIB IP Forwarding Table MIB Elective 1354 SNMP-PARTY-MIB Administration of SNMP Elective 1353 SNMP-SEC SNMP Security Protocols Elective 1352 SNMP-ADMIN SNMP Administrative Model Elective 1351 TOS Type of Service in the Internet Elective 1349 PPP-AUTH PPP Authentication Elective 1334 PPP-LINK PPP Link Quality Monitoring Elective 1333 PPP-IPCP PPP Control Protocol Elective 1332 ------- X.400 1988 to 1984 downgrading Elective 1328 ------- Mapping between X.400(1988) Elective 1327 TCP-EXT TCP Extensions for High Performance Elective 1323 FRAME-MIB Management Information Base for Frame Elective 1315 NETFAX File Format for the Exchange of Images Elective 1314 IARP Inverse Address Resolution Protocol Elective 1293 FDDI-MIB FDDI-MIB Elective 1285 ------- Encoding Network Addresses Elective 1277 ------- Replication and Distributed Operations Elective 1276 ------- COSINE and Internet X.500 Schema Elective 1274 BGP-MIB Border Gateway Protocol MIB (Version 3) Elective 1269 ICMP-ROUT ICMP Router Discovery Messages Elective 1256 OSPF-MIB OSPF Version 2 MIB Elective 1253 IPSO DoD Security Options for IP Elective 1108 OSI-UDP OSI TS on UDP Elective 1240 STD-MIBs Reassignment of Exp MIBs to Std MIBs Elective 1239 IPX-IP Tunneling IPX Traffic through IP Nets Elective 1234 GINT-MIB Extensions to the Generic-Interface MIB Elective 1229 IS-IS OSI IS-IS for TCP/IP Dual Environments Elective 1195 IP-CMPRS Compressing TCP/IP Headers Elective 1144
SNMPv2 SMI for SNMPv2 Elective 1442 SNMPv2 Introduction to SNMPv2 Elective 1441 PEM-KEY PEM - Key Certification Elective 1424 PEM-ALG PEM - Algorithms, Modes, and Identifiers Elective 1423 PEM-CKM PEM - Certificate-Based Key Management Elective 1422 PEM-ENC PEM - Message Encryption and Auth Elective 1421 SNMP-IPX SNMP over IPX Elective 1420 SNMP-AT SNMP over AppleTalk Elective 1419 SNMP-OSI SNMP over OSI Elective 1418 FTP-FTAM FTP-FTAM Gateway Specification Elective 1415 IDENT-MIB Identification MIB Elective 1414 IDENT Identification Protocol Elective 1413 DS3/E3-MIB DS3/E3 Interface Type Elective 1407 DS1/E1-MIB DS1/E1 Interface Type Elective 1406 BGP-OSPF BGP OSPF Interaction Elective 1403 -------- Route Advertisement In BGP2 And BGP3 Elective 1397 SNMP-X.25 SNMP MIB Extension for X.25 Packet Layer Elective 1382 SNMP-LAPB SNMP MIB Extension for X.25 LAPB Elective 1381 PPP-ATCP PPP AppleTalk Control Protocol Elective 1378 PPP-OSINLCP PPP OSI Network Layer Control Protocol Elective 1377 TABLE-MIB IP Forwarding Table MIB Elective 1354 SNMP-PARTY-MIB Administration of SNMP Elective 1353 SNMP-SEC SNMP Security Protocols Elective 1352 SNMP-ADMIN SNMP Administrative Model Elective 1351 TOS Type of Service in the Internet Elective 1349 PPP-AUTH PPP Authentication Elective 1334 PPP-LINK PPP Link Quality Monitoring Elective 1333 PPP-IPCP PPP Control Protocol Elective 1332 ------- X.400 1988 to 1984 downgrading Elective 1328 ------- Mapping between X.400(1988) Elective 1327 TCP-EXT TCP Extensions for High Performance Elective 1323 FRAME-MIB Management Information Base for Frame Elective 1315 NETFAX File Format for the Exchange of Images Elective 1314 IARP Inverse Address Resolution Protocol Elective 1293 FDDI-MIB FDDI-MIB Elective 1285 ------- Encoding Network Addresses Elective 1277 ------- Replication and Distributed Operations Elective 1276 ------- COSINE and Internet X.500 Schema Elective 1274 BGP-MIB Border Gateway Protocol MIB (Version 3) Elective 1269 ICMP-ROUT ICMP Router Discovery Messages Elective 1256 OSPF-MIB OSPF Version 2 MIB Elective 1253 IPSO DoD Security Options for IP Elective 1108 OSI-UDP OSI TS on UDP Elective 1240 STD-MIBs Reassignment of Exp MIBs to Std MIBs Elective 1239 IPX-IP Tunneling IPX Traffic through IP Nets Elective 1234 GINT-MIB Extensions to the Generic-Interface MIB Elective 1229 IS-IS OSI IS-IS for TCP/IP Dual Environments Elective 1195 IP-CMPRS Compressing TCP/IP Headers Elective 1144
Internet Architecture Board [Page 24] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Internet Architecture Board [Page 24] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
NNTP Network News Transfer Protocol Elective 977
NNTP Network News Transfer Protocol Elective 977
[Note: an asterisk at the end of a line indicates a change from the previous edition of this document.]
[Note: an asterisk at the end of a line indicates a change from the previous edition of this document.]
Applicability Statements:
Applicability Statements:
OSPF - RFC 1370 is an applicability statement for OSPF.
OSPF - RFC 1370 is an applicability statement for OSPF.
Internet Architecture Board [Page 25] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Internet Architecture Board [Page 25] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
6.6. Telnet Options
6.6. Telnet Options
For convenience, all the Telnet Options are collected here with both their state and status.
For convenience, all the Telnet Options are collected here with both their state and status.
Protocol Name Number State Status RFC STD ======== ===================================== ===== ====== ==== === TOPT-BIN Binary Transmission 0 Std Rec 856 27 TOPT-ECHO Echo 1 Std Rec 857 28 TOPT-RECN Reconnection 2 Prop Ele ... TOPT-SUPP Suppress Go Ahead 3 Std Rec 858 29 TOPT-APRX Approx Message Size Negotiation 4 Prop Ele ... TOPT-STAT Status 5 Std Rec 859 30 TOPT-TIM Timing Mark 6 Std Rec 860 31 TOPT-REM Remote Controlled Trans and Echo 7 Prop Ele 726 TOPT-OLW Output Line Width 8 Prop Ele ... TOPT-OPS Output Page Size 9 Prop Ele ... TOPT-OCRD Output Carriage-Return Disposition 10 Prop Ele 652 TOPT-OHT Output Horizontal Tabstops 11 Prop Ele 653 TOPT-OHTD Output Horizontal Tab Disposition 12 Prop Ele 654 TOPT-OFD Output Formfeed Disposition 13 Prop Ele 655 TOPT-OVT Output Vertical Tabstops 14 Prop Ele 656 TOPT-OVTD Output Vertical Tab Disposition 15 Prop Ele 657 TOPT-OLD Output Linefeed Disposition 16 Prop Ele 658 TOPT-EXT Extended ASCII 17 Prop Ele 698 TOPT-LOGO Logout 18 Prop Ele 727 TOPT-BYTE Byte Macro 19 Prop Ele 735 TOPT-DATA Data Entry Terminal 20 Prop Ele 1043 TOPT-SUP SUPDUP 21 Prop Ele 736 TOPT-SUPO SUPDUP Output 22 Prop Ele 749 TOPT-SNDL Send Location 23 Prop Ele 779 TOPT-TERM Terminal Type 24 Prop Ele 1091 TOPT-EOR End of Record 25 Prop Ele 885 TOPT-TACACS TACACS User Identification 26 Prop Ele 927 TOPT-OM Output Marking 27 Prop Ele 933 TOPT-TLN Terminal Location Number 28 Prop Ele 946 TOPT-3270 Telnet 3270 Regime 29 Prop Ele 1041 TOPT-X.3 X.3 PAD 30 Prop Ele 1053 TOPT-NAWS Negotiate About Window Size 31 Prop Ele 1073 TOPT-TS Terminal Speed 32 Prop Ele 1079 TOPT-RFC Remote Flow Control 33 Prop Ele 1372 TOPT-LINE Linemode 34 Draft Ele 1184 TOPT-XDL X Display Location 35 Prop Ele 1096 TOPT-ENVIR Telnet Environment Option 36 Hist Not 1408 TOPT-AUTH Telnet Authentication Option 37 Exp Ele 1416 TOPT-ENVIR Telnet Environment Option 39 Prop Ele 1572 TOPT-EXTOP Extended-Options-List 255 Std Rec 861 32
Protocol Name Number State Status RFC STD ======== ===================================== ===== ====== ==== === TOPT-BIN Binary Transmission 0 Std Rec 856 27 TOPT-ECHO Echo 1 Std Rec 857 28 TOPT-RECN Reconnection 2 Prop Ele ... TOPT-SUPP Suppress Go Ahead 3 Std Rec 858 29 TOPT-APRX Approx Message Size Negotiation 4 Prop Ele ... TOPT-STAT Status 5 Std Rec 859 30 TOPT-TIM Timing Mark 6 Std Rec 860 31 TOPT-REM Remote Controlled Trans and Echo 7 Prop Ele 726 TOPT-OLW Output Line Width 8 Prop Ele ... TOPT-OPS Output Page Size 9 Prop Ele ... TOPT-OCRD Output Carriage-Return Disposition 10 Prop Ele 652 TOPT-OHT Output Horizontal Tabstops 11 Prop Ele 653 TOPT-OHTD Output Horizontal Tab Disposition 12 Prop Ele 654 TOPT-OFD Output Formfeed Disposition 13 Prop Ele 655 TOPT-OVT Output Vertical Tabstops 14 Prop Ele 656 TOPT-OVTD Output Vertical Tab Disposition 15 Prop Ele 657 TOPT-OLD Output Linefeed Disposition 16 Prop Ele 658 TOPT-EXT Extended ASCII 17 Prop Ele 698 TOPT-LOGO Logout 18 Prop Ele 727 TOPT-BYTE Byte Macro 19 Prop Ele 735 TOPT-DATA Data Entry Terminal 20 Prop Ele 1043 TOPT-SUP SUPDUP 21 Prop Ele 736 TOPT-SUPO SUPDUP Output 22 Prop Ele 749 TOPT-SNDL Send Location 23 Prop Ele 779 TOPT-TERM Terminal Type 24 Prop Ele 1091 TOPT-EOR End of Record 25 Prop Ele 885 TOPT-TACACS TACACS User Identification 26 Prop Ele 927 TOPT-OM Output Marking 27 Prop Ele 933 TOPT-TLN Terminal Location Number 28 Prop Ele 946 TOPT-3270 Telnet 3270 Regime 29 Prop Ele 1041 TOPT-X.3 X.3 PAD 30 Prop Ele 1053 TOPT-NAWS Negotiate About Window Size 31 Prop Ele 1073 TOPT-TS Terminal Speed 32 Prop Ele 1079 TOPT-RFC Remote Flow Control 33 Prop Ele 1372 TOPT-LINE Linemode 34 Draft Ele 1184 TOPT-XDL X Display Location 35 Prop Ele 1096 TOPT-ENVIR Telnet Environment Option 36 Hist Not 1408 TOPT-AUTH Telnet Authentication Option 37 Exp Ele 1416 TOPT-ENVIR Telnet Environment Option 39 Prop Ele 1572 TOPT-EXTOP Extended-Options-List 255 Std Rec 861 32
Internet Architecture Board [Page 26] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Internet Architecture Board [Page 26] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
[Note: an asterisk at the end of a line indicates a change from the previous edition of this document.]
[Note: an asterisk at the end of a line indicates a change from the previous edition of this document.]
6.7. Experimental Protocols
6.7. Experimental Protocols
All Experimental protocols have the Limited Use status.
All Experimental protocols have the Limited Use status.
Protocol Name RFC ======== ===================================== ===== ------- Content-Disposition Header 1806* ------- Schema Publishing in X.500 Directory 1804* ------- X.400-MHS use X.500 to support X.400-MHS Routing 1801* ------- Class A Subnet Experiment 1797* TCP/IPXMIB TCP/IPX Connection Mib Specification 1792* ------- TCP And UDP Over IPX Networks With Fixed Path MTU 1791* ICMP-DM ICMP Domain Name Messages 1788* CLNP-MULT Host Group Extensions for CLNP Multicasting 1768 OSPF-OVFL OSPF Database Overflow 1765 RWP Remote Write ProtocolL - Version 1.0 1756 NARP NBMA Address Resolution Protocol 1735 DNS-DEBUG Tools for DNS debugging 1713 DNS-ENCODE DNS Encoding of Geographical Location 1712 TCP-POS An Extension to TCP: Partial Order Service 1693 ------- DNS to Distribute RFC1327 Mail Address Mapping Tables 1664 T/TCP TCP Extensions for Transactions 1644 UTF-7 A Mail-Safe Transformation Format of Unicode 1642 MIME-UNI Using Unicode with MIME 1641 FOOBAR FTP Operation Over Big Address Records 1639 X500-CHART Charting Networks in the X.500 Directory 1609 X500-DIR Representing IP Information in the X.500 Directory 1608 SNMP-DPI SNMP Distributed Protocol Interface 1592 CLNP-TUBA Use of ISO CLNP in TUBA Environments 1561 REM-PRINT TPC.INT Subdomain Remote Printing - Technical 1528 EHF-MAIL Encoding Header Field for Internet Messages 1505 REM-PRT An Experiment in Remote Printing 1486 RAP Internet Route Access Protocol 1476 TP/IX TP/IX: The Next Internet 1475 X400 Routing Coordination for X.400 Services 1465 DNS Storing Arbitrary Attributes in DNS 1464 IRCP Internet Relay Chat Protocol 1459 TOS-LS Link Security TOS 1455 SIFT/UFT Sender-Initiated/Unsolicited File Transfer 1440 DIR-ARP Directed ARP 1433 TEL-SPX Telnet Authentication: SPX 1412 TEL-KER Telnet Authentication: Kerberos V4 1411 MAP-MAIL X.400 Mapping and Mail-11 1405 TRACE-IP Traceroute Using an IP Option 1393 DNS-IP Experiment in DNS Based IP Routing 1383
Protocol Name RFC ======== ===================================== ===== ------- Content-Disposition Header 1806* ------- Schema Publishing in X.500 Directory 1804* ------- X.400-MHS use X.500 to support X.400-MHS Routing 1801* ------- Class A Subnet Experiment 1797* TCP/IPXMIB TCP/IPX Connection Mib Specification 1792* ------- TCP And UDP Over IPX Networks With Fixed Path MTU 1791* ICMP-DM ICMP Domain Name Messages 1788* CLNP-MULT Host Group Extensions for CLNP Multicasting 1768 OSPF-OVFL OSPF Database Overflow 1765 RWP Remote Write ProtocolL - Version 1.0 1756 NARP NBMA Address Resolution Protocol 1735 DNS-DEBUG Tools for DNS debugging 1713 DNS-ENCODE DNS Encoding of Geographical Location 1712 TCP-POS An Extension to TCP: Partial Order Service 1693 ------- DNS to Distribute RFC1327 Mail Address Mapping Tables 1664 T/TCP TCP Extensions for Transactions 1644 UTF-7 A Mail-Safe Transformation Format of Unicode 1642 MIME-UNI Using Unicode with MIME 1641 FOOBAR FTP Operation Over Big Address Records 1639 X500-CHART Charting Networks in the X.500 Directory 1609 X500-DIR Representing IP Information in the X.500 Directory 1608 SNMP-DPI SNMP Distributed Protocol Interface 1592 CLNP-TUBA Use of ISO CLNP in TUBA Environments 1561 REM-PRINT TPC.INT Subdomain Remote Printing - Technical 1528 EHF-MAIL Encoding Header Field for Internet Messages 1505 REM-PRT An Experiment in Remote Printing 1486 RAP Internet Route Access Protocol 1476 TP/IX TP/IX: The Next Internet 1475 X400 Routing Coordination for X.400 Services 1465 DNS Storing Arbitrary Attributes in DNS 1464 IRCP Internet Relay Chat Protocol 1459 TOS-LS Link Security TOS 1455 SIFT/UFT Sender-Initiated/Unsolicited File Transfer 1440 DIR-ARP Directed ARP 1433 TEL-SPX Telnet Authentication: SPX 1412 TEL-KER Telnet Authentication: Kerberos V4 1411 MAP-MAIL X.400 Mapping and Mail-11 1405 TRACE-IP Traceroute Using an IP Option 1393 DNS-IP Experiment in DNS Based IP Routing 1383
Internet Architecture Board [Page 27] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Internet Architecture Board [Page 27] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
RMCP Remote Mail Checking Protocol 1339 TCP-HIPER TCP Extensions for High Performance 1323 MSP2 Message Send Protocol 2 1312 DSLCP Dynamically Switched Link Control 1307 -------- X.500 and Domains 1279 IN-ENCAP Internet Encapsulation Protocol 1241 CLNS-MIB CLNS-MIB 1238 CFDP Coherent File Distribution Protocol 1235 SNMP-DPI SNMP Distributed Program Interface 1228 IP-AX.25 IP Encapsulation of AX.25 Frames 1226 ALERTS Managing Asynchronously Generated Alerts 1224 MPP Message Posting Protocol 1204 ST-II Stream Protocol 1190 SNMP-BULK Bulk Table Retrieval with the SNMP 1187 DNS-RR New DNS RR Definitions 1183 IMAP2 Interactive Mail Access Protocol 1176 NTP-OSI NTP over OSI Remote Operations 1165 DMF-MAIL Digest Message Format for Mail 1153 RDP Reliable Data Protocol 908,1151 TCP-ACO TCP Alternate Checksum Option 1146 -------- Mapping full 822 to Restricted 822 1137 IP-DVMRP IP Distance Vector Multicast Routing 1075 VMTP Versatile Message Transaction Protocol 1045 COOKIE-JAR Authentication Scheme 1004 NETBLT Bulk Data Transfer Protocol 998 IRTP Internet Reliable Transaction Protocol 938 LDP Loader Debugger Protocol 909 RLP Resource Location Protocol 887 NVP-II Network Voice Protocol ISI-memo PVP Packet Video Protocol ISI-memo
RMCP Remote Mail Checking Protocol 1339 TCP-HIPER TCP Extensions for High Performance 1323 MSP2 Message Send Protocol 2 1312 DSLCP Dynamically Switched Link Control 1307 -------- X.500 and Domains 1279 IN-ENCAP Internet Encapsulation Protocol 1241 CLNS-MIB CLNS-MIB 1238 CFDP Coherent File Distribution Protocol 1235 SNMP-DPI SNMP Distributed Program Interface 1228 IP-AX.25 IP Encapsulation of AX.25 Frames 1226 ALERTS Managing Asynchronously Generated Alerts 1224 MPP Message Posting Protocol 1204 ST-II Stream Protocol 1190 SNMP-BULK Bulk Table Retrieval with the SNMP 1187 DNS-RR New DNS RR Definitions 1183 IMAP2 Interactive Mail Access Protocol 1176 NTP-OSI NTP over OSI Remote Operations 1165 DMF-MAIL Digest Message Format for Mail 1153 RDP Reliable Data Protocol 908,1151 TCP-ACO TCP Alternate Checksum Option 1146 -------- Mapping full 822 to Restricted 822 1137 IP-DVMRP IP Distance Vector Multicast Routing 1075 VMTP Versatile Message Transaction Protocol 1045 COOKIE-JAR Authentication Scheme 1004 NETBLT Bulk Data Transfer Protocol 998 IRTP Internet Reliable Transaction Protocol 938 LDP Loader Debugger Protocol 909 RLP Resource Location Protocol 887 NVP-II Network Voice Protocol ISI-memo PVP Packet Video Protocol ISI-memo
[Note: an asterisk at the end of a line indicates a change from the previous edition of this document.]
[Note: an asterisk at the end of a line indicates a change from the previous edition of this document.]
Internet Architecture Board [Page 28] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Internet Architecture Board [Page 28] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
6.8. Informational Protocols
6.8. Informational Protocols
Information protocols have no status.
Information protocols have no status.
Protocol Name RFC ======= ==================================== ===== NFSV3 NFS Version 3 Protocol Specification 1813* -------- A Format for Bibliographic Records 1807* SDMD IPv4 Option for Sender Directed MD Delivery 1770 SNTP Simple Network Time Protocol 1769 SNOOP Snoop Version 2 Packet Capture File Format 1761 BINHEX MIME Content Type for BinHex Encoded Files 1741 RWHOIS Referral Whois Protocol 1714 DNS-NSAP DNS NSAP Resource Records 1706 RADIO-PAGE TPC.INT Subdomain: Radio Paging -- Technical Procedures 1703 GRE-IPv4 Generic Routing Encapsulation over IPv4 1702 GRE Generic Routing Encapsulatio 1701 SNPP Simple Network Paging Protocol - Version 2 1645 IPXWAN Novell IPX Over Various WAN Media 1634 ADSNA-IP Advanced SNA/IP: A Simple SNA Transport Protocol 1538 AUBR Appletalk Update-Based Routing Protocol... 1504 TACACS Terminal Access Control Protocol 1492 SUN-NFS Network File System Protocol 1094 SUN-RPC Remote Procedure Call Protocol Version 2 1057 GOPHER The Internet Gopher Protocol 1436 ------- Data Link Switching: Switch-to-Switch Protocol 1434 LISTSERV Listserv Distribute Protocol 1429 ------- Replication Requirements 1275 PCMAIL Pcmail Transport Protocol 1056 MTP Multicast Transport Protocol 1301 BSD Login BSD Login 1282 DIXIE DIXIE Protocol Specification 1249 IP-X.121 IP to X.121 Address Mapping for DDN 1236 OSI-HYPER OSI and LLC1 on HYPERchannel 1223 HAP2 Host Access Protocol 1221 SUBNETASGN On the Assignment of Subnet Numbers 1219 SNMP-TRAPS Defining Traps for use with SNMP 1215 DAS Directory Assistance Service 1202 MD4 MD4 Message Digest Algorithm 1186 LPDP Line Printer Daemon Protocol 1179
Protocol Name RFC ======= ==================================== ===== NFSV3 NFS Version 3 Protocol Specification 1813* -------- A Format for Bibliographic Records 1807* SDMD IPv4 Option for Sender Directed MD Delivery 1770 SNTP Simple Network Time Protocol 1769 SNOOP Snoop Version 2 Packet Capture File Format 1761 BINHEX MIME Content Type for BinHex Encoded Files 1741 RWHOIS Referral Whois Protocol 1714 DNS-NSAP DNS NSAP Resource Records 1706 RADIO-PAGE TPC.INT Subdomain: Radio Paging -- Technical Procedures 1703 GRE-IPv4 Generic Routing Encapsulation over IPv4 1702 GRE Generic Routing Encapsulatio 1701 SNPP Simple Network Paging Protocol - Version 2 1645 IPXWAN Novell IPX Over Various WAN Media 1634 ADSNA-IP Advanced SNA/IP: A Simple SNA Transport Protocol 1538 AUBR Appletalk Update-Based Routing Protocol... 1504 TACACS Terminal Access Control Protocol 1492 SUN-NFS Network File System Protocol 1094 SUN-RPC Remote Procedure Call Protocol Version 2 1057 GOPHER The Internet Gopher Protocol 1436 ------- Data Link Switching: Switch-to-Switch Protocol 1434 LISTSERV Listserv Distribute Protocol 1429 ------- Replication Requirements 1275 PCMAIL Pcmail Transport Protocol 1056 MTP Multicast Transport Protocol 1301 BSD Login BSD Login 1282 DIXIE DIXIE Protocol Specification 1249 IP-X.121 IP to X.121 Address Mapping for DDN 1236 OSI-HYPER OSI and LLC1 on HYPERchannel 1223 HAP2 Host Access Protocol 1221 SUBNETASGN On the Assignment of Subnet Numbers 1219 SNMP-TRAPS Defining Traps for use with SNMP 1215 DAS Directory Assistance Service 1202 MD4 MD4 Message Digest Algorithm 1186 LPDP Line Printer Daemon Protocol 1179
[Note: an asterisk at the end of a line indicates a change from the previous edition of this document.]
[Note: an asterisk at the end of a line indicates a change from the previous edition of this document.]
Internet Architecture Board [Page 29] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
Internet Architecture Board [Page 29] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
6.9. Historic Protocols
6.9. Historic Protocols
All Historic protocols have Not Recommended status.
All Historic protocols have Not Recommended status.
Protocol Name RFC STD ======== ===================================== ===== === BGP3 Border Gateway Protocol 3 (BGP-3) 1267,1268 * -------- Gateway Requirements Req 1009 4 EGP Exterior Gateway Protocol Rec 904 18 SNMP-MUX SNMP MUX Protocol and MIB 1227 OIM-MIB-II OSI Internet Management: MIB-II 1214 IMAP3 Interactive Mail Access Protocol Version 3 1203 SUN-RPC Remote Procedure Call Protocol Version 1 1050 802.4-MIP IEEE 802.4 Token Bus MIB 1230 CMOT Common Management Information Services 1189 -------- Mail Privacy: Procedures 1113 -------- Mail Privacy: Key Management 1114 -------- Mail Privacy: Algorithms 1115 NFILE A File Access Protocol 1037 HOSTNAME HOSTNAME Protocol 953 SFTP Simple File Transfer Protocol 913 SUPDUP SUPDUP Protocol 734 BGP Border Gateway Protocol 1163,1164 MIB-I MIB-I 1156 SGMP Simple Gateway Monitoring Protocol 1028 HEMS High Level Entity Management Protocol 1021 STATSRV Statistics Server 996 POP2 Post Office Protocol, Version 2 937 RATP Reliable Asynchronous Transfer Protocol 916 HFEP Host - Front End Protocol 929 THINWIRE Thinwire Protocol 914 HMP Host Monitoring Protocol 869 GGP Gateway Gateway Protocol 823 RTELNET Remote Telnet Service 818 CLOCK DCNET Time Server Protocol 778 MPM Internet Message Protocol 759 NETRJS Remote Job Service 740 NETED Network Standard Text Editor 569 RJE Remote Job Entry 407 XNET Cross Net Debugger IEN-158 NAMESERVER Host Name Server Protocol IEN-116 MUX Multiplexing Protocol IEN-90 GRAPHICS Graphics Protocol NIC-24308
プロトコル名前RFC STD======== ===================================== ===== === BGP3ボーダ・ゲイトウェイ・プロトコル3(BGP-3)1267、1268*-------- ゲートウェイ要件Req1009 4のEGPの外のゲートウェイプロトコルRec904 18SNMP-多重化装置SNMP多重化装置プロトコルとMIB1227OIM-MIB-II OSIインターネット管理: 1214年のMIB-IIのIMAP3の対話的なメールアクセス・プロトコルバージョン3 1203太陽-RPC遠隔手続き呼び出しプロトコルバージョン1 1050 802.4-MIP IEEE802.4トークンバスMIB1230CMOT共通管理情報サービス1189-------- プライバシーを郵送してください: 手順1113-------- プライバシーを郵送してください: Key Management1114-------- プライバシーを郵送してください: アルゴリズム1115NFILE Aファイルアクセス・プロトコル1037ホスト名ホスト名プロトコル953SFTPの簡単なファイル転送プロトコル913SUPDUP SUPDUPプロトコル734BGPボーダ・ゲイトウェイ・プロトコル1163、1164年の1156年のMIB-I SGMPの簡単なゲートウェイモニターしているMIB-Iプロトコル1028は1021STATSRV統計サーバ996POP2郵便局が議定書の中で述べる高い平らな実体管理プロトコルのへりを取ります; バージョン2 937のRATPの信頼できる非同期な転送プロトコル916HFEPホスト--プロトコル869GGPゲートウェイゲートウェイプロトコル823RTELNETのリモートtelnetサービス818時計DCNET時間サーバをプロトコル778のmpmモニターしているフロントエンドプロトコル929THINWIRE Thinwireプロトコル914HMPホスト; インターネットメッセージプロトコル759NETRJSリモート・ジョブサービス740NETEDのネットワークの標準のテキストエディタ569RJEリモートジョブエントリ407XNETはネットデバッガIEN-158ネームサーバホスト名サーバプロトコルIEN-116多重化装置マルチプレクシングプロトコルIEN-90グラフィックスグラフィックスプロトコルNIC-24308に交差しています。
[Note: an asterisk at the end of a line indicates a change from the previous edition of this document.]
[注意: 線の端のアスタリスクはこのドキュメントの前の版から変化を示します。]
Internet Architecture Board [Page 30] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会[30ページ]RFC1800インターネット規格1995年7月
6.10. Obsolete Protocols
6.10. 時代遅れのプロトコル
Some of the protocols listed in this memo are described in RFCs that are obsoleted by newer RFCs. "Obsolete" or "obsoleted" is not an official state or status of protocols. This subsection is for information only.
このメモに記載されたプロトコルのいくつかが、より新しいRFCsによって時代遅れにされるRFCsで説明されます。 「時代遅れに「時代遅れ」か」が、プロトコルの公式の状態でなくて、また状態でもありません。 この小区分は情報だけのためのものです。
While it may seem to be obviously wrong to have an obsoleted RFC in the list of standards, there may be cases when an older standard is in the process of being replaced. This process may take a year or two.
取り替えることの途中により古い規格があるとき、規格のリストに時代遅れにされたRFCを持っているのが明らかに間違っているように思えているかもしれない間、ケースがあるかもしれません。 このプロセスは1年か2年取るかもしれません。
For example, the Network Time Protocol (NTP) [RFC 1119] is in its version 2 a full Standard, and in its version 3 is a Draft Standard [RFC 1305]. Once version 3 is a full Standard, version 2 will be made Historic.
例えば、Network Timeプロトコル(NTP)[RFC1119]はバージョン2の完全なStandardです、そして、バージョン3に、Draft Standard[RFC1305]があります。 バージョン3がいったん完全なStandardになると、バージョン2は人工のHistoricになるでしょう。
Many obsoleted protocols are of little interest and are dropped from this memo altogether. Some obsoleted protocols have received enough recognition that it seems appropriate to list them under their current status and with the following reference to their current replacement.
多くの時代遅れにされたプロトコルが、わずかの関心があって、全体でこのメモから下げられます。 それらの現在の状態と彼らの現在の交換の以下の参照でそれらを記載するのが適切な状態でいくつかの時代遅れにされたプロトコルがそれが思える十分な評価を受けました。
RFC RFC Status Title * ==== ==== ========= =================================== = 1661 obsoletes 1548 Draft /Ele The Point to Point Protocol (PPP) * 1305 obsoletes 1119 Std /Rec Network Time Protocol (Version 2) 1533 obsoletes 1497 Draft/Rec Bootstrap Protocol 1574 obsoletes 1139 Prop /Ele Echo for ISO-8473 1573 obsoletes 1229 Prop /Ele Extensions to the Generic-IF MIB 1559 obsoletes 1289 Prop /Ele DECNET MIB 1541 obsoletes 1531 Prop /Ele Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol 1592 obsoletes 1228 Exper/Lim SNMP Distributed Program Interface 1528 obsoletes 1486 Exper/Lim An Experiment in Remote Printing 1320 obsoletes 1186 Info / MD4 Message Digest Algorithm 1057 obsoletes 1050 Hist /Not Remote Procedure Call Version 1 1421 obsoletes 1113 Hist /Not Mail Privacy: Procedures 1422 obsoletes 1114 Hist /Not Mail Privacy: Key Management 1423 obsoletes 1115 Hist /Not Mail Privacy: Algorithms 1267 obsoletes 1163 Hist /Not Border Gateway Protocol 1268 obsoletes 1164 Hist /Not Border Gateway Protocol
RFC RFC状態タイトル*==== ==== ========= =================================== = 1661が1548Draft /Ele Pointを時代遅れにする、(PPP)*1305が時代遅れにするPointプロトコルに、1119Std /Rec Network Timeプロトコル(バージョン2)1533がDraft/Rec Bootstrapプロトコル1574が1139Prop /Ele Echoを時代遅れにする1497を時代遅れにする、ISO-8473 1573はProp /Ele DECNET MIB1541が時代遅れにする1559が時代遅れにするGeneric-IF MIB1289に1229Prop /Ele Extensionsを時代遅れにします; 1531年の支柱/Ele Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol1592がExper/リムSNMP Distributed Program Interface1528が1486Exper/リムAn Experimentを時代遅れにする1228年を時代遅れにする、Remote Printing1320が時代遅れにする、1186Info / MD4 Message Digest Algorithm1057がRemote Procedure Callバージョンではなく、1050Hist/を時代遅れにする、1、1421、メールPrivacyではなく、1113Hist/が時代遅れにします: 手順1422はメールPrivacyではなく、1114Hist/を時代遅れにします: Key Management1423はメールPrivacyではなく、1115Hist/を時代遅れにします: アルゴリズム1267が時代遅れにする、ボーダ・ゲイトウェイ・プロトコル1268ではなく、1163Hist/がボーダ・ゲイトウェイ・プロトコルではなく、1164Hist/を時代遅れにします。
Thanks to Lynn Wheeler of Britton Lee for compiling the information in this subsection.
ブリトン・リーのリンウィーラーにこの小区分における情報をコンパイルしてくださってありがとうございます。
[Note: an asterisk at the end of a line indicates a change from the previous edition of this document.]
[注意: 線の端のアスタリスクはこのドキュメントの前の版から変化を示します。]
Internet Architecture Board [Page 31] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会[31ページ]RFC1800インターネット規格1995年7月
7. Contacts
7. 接触
7.1. IAB, IETF, and IRTF Contacts
7.1. IAB、IETF、およびIRTF接触
7.1.1. Internet Architecture Board (IAB) Contact
7.1.1. インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会(IAB)の接触
Please send your comments about this list of protocols and especially about the Draft Standard Protocols to the Internet Architecture Board care of Abel Winerib, IAB Executive Director.
プロトコルのこのリストの周りと、そして、Draft Standardプロトコルの特に周りに関してアベルWinerib、IAB事務局長のインターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会注意にコメントを送ってください。
Contacts:
接触:
Abel Winerib
Executive Director of the IAB
Intel, JF2-64
2111 NE 25th Avenue
Hillsboro, OR 97124
IABインテル事務局長、第25アベル・Winerib JF2-64 2111Ne Avenueヒルズバロか97124
1-503-696-8972
1-503-696-8972
AWeinrib@ibeam.jf.intel.com
AWeinrib@ibeam.jf.intel.com
Christian Huitema
Chair of the IAB
INRIA, Sophia-Antipolis
2004 Route des Lucioles
BP 109
F-06561 Valbonne Cedex
France
IAB INRIA、2004台のソフィア-Antipolis Route desルシオールBP109F-06561Valbonne CedexフランスのクリスチャンのHuitema議長
+33 93 65 77 15
+33 93 65 77 15
Christian.Huitema@MIRSA.INRIA.FR
Christian.Huitema@MIRSA.INRIA.FR
7.1.2. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Contact
7.1.2. インターネット・エンジニアリング・タスク・フォース(IETF)の接触
Contacts:
接触:
Paul Mockapetris
Chair of the IETF
USC/Information Sciences Institute
4676 Admiralty Way
Marina del Rey, CA 90292-6695
IETF USC/情報Sciences Institute4676海軍本部Wayマリナデルレイ、カリフォルニア90292-6695のポールMockapetris議長
1-310-822-1511
1-310-822-1511
pvm@ISI.EDU
pvm@ISI.EDU
Internet Architecture Board [Page 32] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会[32ページ]RFC1800インターネット規格1995年7月
Steve Coya
IESG Secretary
Corporation for National Research Initiatives
1895 Preston White Drive, Suite 100
Reston, VA 22091
レストン、Suite100ヴァージニア 国家の研究イニシアチブ1895のプレストンの白いドライブ、22091へのスティーブCoya IESG長官社
1-703-620-8990
1-703-620-8990
scoya@CNRI.RESTON.VA.US
scoya@CNRI.RESTON.VA.US
Steve Coya
Executive Director of the IETF
Corporation for National Research Initiatives
1895 Preston White Drive, Suite 100
Reston, VA 22091
100レストン、Suiteヴァージニア 国家の研究イニシアチブ1895のプレストンの白いドライブ、22091へのIETF社のスティーブCoya事務局長
1-703-620-8990
1-703-620-8990
scoya@CNRI.RESTON.VA.US
scoya@CNRI.RESTON.VA.US
7.1.3. Internet Research Task Force (IRTF) Contact
7.1.3. インターネット研究特別委員会(IRTF)接触
Contact:
接触:
Abel Winerib
Chair of the IRTF
Intel, JF2-64
2111 NE 25th Avenue
Hillsboro, OR 97124
IRTFインテル、第25JF2-64 2111Ne Avenueヒルズバロ、または97124歳のアベルWinerib議長
1-503-696-8972
1-503-696-8972
AWeinrib@ibeam.jf.intel.com
AWeinrib@ibeam.jf.intel.com
Internet Architecture Board [Page 33] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会[33ページ]RFC1800インターネット規格1995年7月
7.2. Internet Assigned Numbers Authority Contact
7.2. インターネット規定番号権威接触
Contact:
接触:
Joyce K. Reynolds
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
USC/Information Sciences Institute
4676 Admiralty Way
Marina del Rey, CA 90292-6695
ジョイスK.レイノルズインターネットAssigned民数記Authority USC/情報Sciences Institute4676海軍本部Wayマリナデルレイ、カリフォルニア90292-6695
1-310-822-1511
1-310-822-1511
IANA@ISI.EDU
IANA@ISI.EDU
The protocol standards are managed by the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority.
プロトコル標準はインターネットAssigned民数記Authorityによって管理されます。
Please refer to the document "Assigned Numbers" (RFC-1700) for further information about the status of protocol documents. There are two documents that summarize the requirements for host and gateways in the Internet, "Host Requirements" (RFC-1122 and RFC-1123) and "Requirements for IP Version 4 Routers" (RFC-1812).
プロトコルドキュメントの状態に関する詳細についてドキュメント「規定番号」(RFC-1700)を参照してください。 インターネットと、「ホスト要件」(RFC-1122とRFC-1123)のホストとゲートウェイと「IPバージョン4ルータのための要件」(RFC-1812)のための要件をまとめる2通のドキュメントがあります。
How to obtain the most recent edition of this "Internet Official
Protocol Standards" memo:
どう「インターネット公式プロトコル標準」というこのメモの最新の版を入手するか:
The file "in-notes/std/std1.txt" may be copied via FTP from the
FTP.ISI.EDU computer using the FTP username "anonymous" and FTP
password "guest".
ファイル「注意の/std/std1.txt」は、「ゲスト」というFTPユーザ名「匿名」とFTPパスワードを使用することでFTP.ISI.EDUコンピュータからのFTPでコピーされるかもしれません。
Internet Architecture Board [Page 34] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会[34ページ]RFC1800インターネット規格1995年7月
7.3. Request for Comments Editor Contact
7.3. コメントには、エディタ接触を要求してください。
Contact:
接触:
Jon Postel
RFC Editor
USC/Information Sciences Institute
4676 Admiralty Way
Marina del Rey, CA 90292-6695
ジョンポステルRFC Editor USC/Information Sciences Institute4676海軍本部Wayマリナデルレイ、カリフォルニア90292-6695
1-310-822-1511
1-310-822-1511
RFC-Editor@ISI.EDU
RFC-Editor@ISI.EDU
Documents may be submitted via electronic mail to the RFC Editor for consideration for publication as RFC. If you are not familiar with the format or style requirements please request the "Instructions for RFC Authors". In general, the style of any recent RFC may be used as a guide.
公表のための考慮のためにRFCとしてRFC Editorへの電子メールを通してドキュメントを提出するかもしれません。 形式かスタイル要件になじみ深くないなら、「RFC作者のための指示」を要求してください。 一般に、どんな最近のRFCのスタイルもガイドとして使用されるかもしれません。
7.4. The Network Information Center and
Requests for Comments Distribution Contact
7.4. 分配が連絡するコメントを求めるネットワーク情報センターと要求
RFC's may be obtained from DS.INTERNIC.NET via FTP, WAIS, and
electronic mail. Through FTP, RFC's are stored as rfc/rfcnnnn.txt
or rfc/rfcnnnn.ps where 'nnnn' is the RFC number. Login as
"anonymous" and provide your e-mail address as the password.
Through WAIS, you may use either your local WAIS client or telnet
to DS.INTERNIC.NET and login as "wais" (no password required) to
access a WAIS client. Help information and a tutorial for using
WAIS are available online. The WAIS database to search is "rfcs".
FTP、WAIS、および電子メールを通してDS.INTERNIC.NETからRFCのものを入手するかもしれません。 FTPを通して、RFCのものは'nnnn'がRFC番号であるrfc/rfcnnnn.txtかrfc/rfcnnnn.psとして保存されます。 「匿名」としてログインしてください、そして、パスワードとしてEメールアドレスを提供してください。 WAISを通して、あなたは、あなたの地元のWAISクライアントかtelnetをDS.INTERNIC.NETに使用して、WAISクライアントにアクセスするために"wais"(どんなパスワードも必要でない)としてログインできます。 WAISを使用するためのヘルプ情報とチュートリアルはオンラインで利用可能です。 捜すWAISデータベースは"rfcs"です。
Directory and Database Services also provides a mail server
interface. Send a mail message to mailserv@ds.internic.net and
include any of the following commands in the message body:
また、ディレクトリとDatabase Servicesはメールサーバインタフェースを提供します。 メール・メッセージを mailserv@ds.internic.net に送ってください、そして、メッセージ本体で以下のコマンドのどれかを含めてください:
document-by-name rfcnnnn where 'nnnn' is the RFC number
The text version is sent.
'nnnn'がテキストバージョンが送られるRFC番号である名前のドキュメントrfcnnnn。
file /ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyy where 'nnnn' is the RFC number.
and 'yyy' is 'txt' or 'ps'.
''RFC番号はそうです'というnnnn yyy'が'txt'か'ps'である/ftp/rfc/rfcnnnn.yyyをファイルしてください。
help to get information on how to use
the mailserver.
どうmailserverを使用するかの情報を得るのを助けてください。
The InterNIC directory and database services collection of
resource listings, internet documents such as RFCs, FYIs, STDs,
and Internet Drafts, and publicly accessible databases are also
また、リソースリストのInterNICディレクトリとデータベース・サービス収集、RFCsや、FYIsや、STDsや、インターネットDraftsなどのインターネットドキュメント、および公的にアクセス可能なデータベースはそうです。
Internet Architecture Board [Page 35] RFC 1800 Internet Standards July 1995
インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会[35ページ]RFC1800インターネット規格1995年7月
now available via Gopher. All our collections are WAIS indexed
and can be searched from the Gopher menu.
現在、ゴーファーで利用可能です。 私たちのすべての収集は、索引をつけられたWAISであり、ゴーファーメニューから捜すことができます。
To access the InterNIC Gopher Servers, please connect to
"internic.net" port 70.
InterNICゴーファーServersにアクセスするには、"internic.net"ポート70に接続してください。
Contact: admin@ds.internic.net
接触: admin@ds.internic.net
7.5. Sources for Requests for Comments
7.5. コメントを求める要求のためのソース
Details on many sources of RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending an EMAIL message to "rfc-info@ISI.EDU" with the message body "help: ways_to_get_rfcs". For example:
メッセージ本体がある" rfc-info@ISI.EDU "への「以下を助ける」というメールメッセージを送ることによって、FTPかメールを通したRFCsの多くの源に関する詳細を得るかもしれません。 「_への_が_rfcsを手に入れる方法。」 例えば:
To: rfc-info@ISI.EDU
Subject: getting rfcs
To: rfc-info@ISI.EDU Subject: rfcsを手に入れます。
help: ways_to_get_rfcs
以下を助けてください。 _への_が_rfcsを手に入れる方法
8. Security Considerations
8. セキュリティ問題
Security issues are not addressed in this memo.
安全保障問題はこのメモで扱われません。
9. Author's Address
9. 作者のアドレス
Jon Postel USC/Information Sciences Institute 4676 Admiralty Way Marina del Rey, CA 90292
ジョンポステルUSC/Information Sciences Institute4676海軍本部Wayマリナデルレイ、カリフォルニア 90292
Phone: 310-822-1511 Fax: 310-823-6714
以下に電話をしてください。 310-822-1511 Fax: 310-823-6714
Email: Postel@ISI.EDU
メール: Postel@ISI.EDU
Internet Architecture Board [Page 36]
インターネット・アーキテクチャ委員会[36ページ]
一覧
スポンサーリンク
